Skip Navigation

Bulletins and News Discussion from August 12th to August 18th, 2024 - Marshall Plan: Now As Farce - COTW: Ireland

Image is of one of Ireland's only manned navy ships, the Samuel Beckett. Image sourced from this BBC article.


Putler has been HUMILIATED by the Kursk offensive and this proves that Russia's army is in tatters and unable even to defend its own territory. However, it is simultaneously true that Russia poses an existential threat to countries thousands of miles away, as this recent Politico article demonstrates. Ireland - a country that immediately springs to mind as one surrounded by enemies - is being bullied due to its lack of military.

Despite bearing responsibility for 16 percent of the EU’s territorial waters, and the fact that 75 percent of transatlantic undersea cables pass through or near Irish waters, Ireland is totally defenseless. And I mean completely unable to protect critical infrastructure, or even pretend to secure its own borders. [...] Ireland’s “navy” of six patrol vessels is currently operating with one operational ship due to chronic staff shortages. [...] Ireland simply has no undersea capabilities. How could it, when it barely spends 0.2 percent of GDP on security and defense? And it has, in effect, abdicated responsibility for protecting the Europe’s northwestern borders.

For all we know, the dreaded sea-people from the Bronze Age Collapse could soon emerge from the North Atlantic.

Unfortunately, things are even worse up in the skies. Ireland has no combat jets, and it’s the only country in Europe that can’t monitor its own airspace due to the lack of primary radar systems. Instead, the country has outsourced its security to Britain in a technically secret agreement between Dublin and London, which effectively cedes control over Irish air space to the Royal Air Force. This must be the luck of the Irish — smile and get someone else to protect you for free.

While this is very silly, rearmament has long been a part of US imperial strategy on an economic level. Desai, discussing the US imperial strategy in the WW2 period:

By 1947 [...] the domestic postwar consumer boom was nearing its end. While financing exports became more urgent, the 1946 elections returned a Congress unlikely to approve further loans. Now the Truman Administration concocted the ‘red menace’ to ‘scare the hell out of the country’, enunciated the Truman Doctrine of US support for armed resistance to ‘subjugation’ which launched the cold war, and Congress granted $400 million to prevent left-wing triumphs in Greece and Turkey in 1947.

One reading of history states that the US was so intimidated by the USSR that this forced a policy of massive arms production even outside of official wartime. Why this arms production is not occurring today can be puzzling, and (very reasonably) explained by neoliberals exporting industrial production overseas. However, a different historical reading can explain both the first Cold War, and the ongoing situation in which American weaponry is being almost purposefully given in insufficient numbers to give Ukraine a chance of victory and thus only prolonging their suffering (while generating massive profit for the military-industrial complex):

In this sense the Cold War was not the cause of US imperial policy but its effect. It combined financing exports with fighting combined development by national capitalisms as well as communism. When such ‘totalitarian regimes’ threatened ‘free peoples’, ‘America’s world economic responsibilities’ included aid to countries battling them.

By selling massively expensive weapons to Europe, America could simultaneously guarantee export markets for its industries, trap Europe into reliance on American industries at the expense of their own, and divert European funds away from constructing factories which could compete with American ones. Providing a way to defend against Soviet communism (and now Russian "imperialism") is merely a happy side-effect, and so the lack of effectiveness of American weaponry is causing no great panic among the military-industrial complex, nor an urgent plan to quintuple artillery shell production or Patriot missile production - the deals for F-35s and such are still there, and they are what matter.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Ireland! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


1.5K

You're viewing a single thread.

1.5K comments
  • Do we have any romanian comrades here? I have a direct friend in Romania I speak to every day who would be susceptible to socialist ideas but has a view that "socialism and communism are public enemy no 1" and "my family had 5 people detained and executed".

    I really like this person and while I can talk about most countries I am absolutely not informed enough to talk about Romania. I'd love a starting point or something.

    • Depends on a multitude of factors

      • whether or not they're born in Romania
      • whether or not they're born after the Revolution
      • family's social position during communism (working class, apparatchik or other)
      • family's social position now (working class, bourgeois or peasants) and whether they moved with them or are still in Romania
      • (less so but still important) opinion on Roma, many dislike communism because the Roma were treated marginally better then they are now
      • (less important) which part of Romania they're from (east is poor, Transylvania is richer and has more wannabe euros, think western lib mindset or worst case scenario Iron Guard fetishists, this applies for Bucharest too)

      I'm Romanian,living in Romania, but I will admit my knowledge of the communist period doesn't go far from what we're taught in school and some less anti communist sources, but it's not much, so I won't be giving out any takes on what we had more than, some good,some bad

      Pre Ceausescu mostly alright, considering WW2 had ended, initial Ceausescu ok, started to go far into nationalism, spilt from the Warsaw Pact wasn't good, tried to act more independently,ended up somewhat cozying to US, attempted industrialization financed with IMF loans-very bad move, led to austerity, this is where most criticism of the regime comes,seeing as there were actual shortages and people had to wait in line for basic goods this being done to pay off the loans, ironically the debt was paid in full in early 1989, too little too late, legitimate discontent used as fig leaf for military coup backed by western interests in December,start of shock therapy and abysmal poverty,and till now mostly corruption scandals and trying to recover from that period

      Plenty to criticize (draconian abortion ban, abysmal orphanage conditions that scarred a generation of kids, excesses like the People's Palace that replaced an entire old quarter of Bucharest, poorly trying to copy the real popularity the Kim family had in Korea, nationalistic historical revisionism, obsessive focus on the dacian side of the Romanian ethnogenesis as the core of Romanian identity, trying to appeal to both sides in Israel and Palestine), but overall created the basis of what we have today (we still depend on the housing they built and the infrastructure from those times) and took a mostly illiterate and poorly developed nation into the modern age with all the growing pains that process involves

      That's the extent of what I can say, I would welcome more well read commrades to correct and add to my very limited summary and provide additional context that could help you

      To close off, you should expect this to be a lengthy process, I know from experience how deep the anticommunism runs in Romanians, this having to do with it being imposed by the USSR for a good reason, but still tapping into more or less two centuries worth of previous attempts by Tzarist Russia to add Romania to itself led people to believe the communist period was a continuation of previous Russian imperialism, and the previous things I mentioned, and this goes doubly for those who left,as they were the ones most disillusioned by the failure of capitalism to save post communist Romania, leading them to develop an inferiority complex and blame the "communist heritage" the country had

      Oh,and as a final addition,if they make any mention of the "Social Democratic" party that is in power in a coalition with the liberals at the moment as being some "red plague", dismiss that out of hand

      Both big right wing parties in Romania at the moment have their roots in the "Front of National Salvation" in the nineties, a political party created by those who orchestrated the military coup and were in power for most of the nineties, they are as communist as Labor is, though forced to be somewhat less rabid in the neoliberalism department due to the circumstances present here,they are peoples favorite thing to point to and pretend the PCR(communist party) is still alive and to blame for all of modern Romania's ills (corruption mostly)

        • Extinct like the dodo bird for now

          Old people love to reminisce,but the sentiment doesn't translate to any meaningful political movement

          The Social Democrats are kind of a cartel party, offering benefits for votes, backroom deals type of stuff Young people are eurobrained to the max if they're not apolitical anticommunists

          The only "reform" party that sprung up after a massive corruption scandal in the Social Democratic party was a mish mash of various currents,some leftish sentiment,but the euroatlanticist libs came out on top and now the party barely exists as a political force

          So to give my very limited and not at all authoritative analysis about how the current political climate is, I'd say business as usual since the 90's, the SocDem Liberal coalition that's in power now we jokingly call the reunified National Salvation Front,since both parties are splinters from it,one "left" and one "right", the reformists (Save Romania Union) are a spent force and now any reform minded youth goes for independents as far as I know

          Still,the youth don't really have any actual goals in mind, mostly wanting to toss the old guard out so we can be like the "proper Europeans" in the West, all anti-corruption,but pro-EU and pro-NATO

          The Socialist party just barely exists and consists of two old guys who love Ceausescu

          People like me are like the needle in the haystack for now

          We aren't in any significant crisis that I know of(but maybe that's me being sheltered) so nothing to create radicalism

          I'd say we're in some sort of very small and incremental improvement due to NATO pumping funds into our infrastructure and the war in Ukraine being an economic boon for now, with them having to use our ports to transport grains and such after the sea corridor thing went bust

          The average Romanian isn't impacted by the war,unless they live in a border region like yours truly so it's out of sight out of mind for most people

          Oh,and we had our own Far Right party rising up after 2020, but the people leading it were incompetent and now are stagnating at 15% or something like that for a while

          And they splintered too,the mainstream one is pro NATO anti Eu and there's also a smaller one that broke away that's pro-Russia,but they're not really a significant political force

          So I guess that's another sad thing,you z post in here, people will think you're a right wing crank

          Still, Romanians aren't too happy with Ukraine either, mainly due to a minority rights issue concerning the "Moldovan" identity which is a big sticking point for Romanians seeing as they think the Romanians and Moldovans are one and the same and that the usage of that term is a holdover from the USSR and it has to do with Russian imperialism

          Ukraine also has regions which were part of Romania so that's another sticking point for the nationalists

          Sorry for the tangent

          So,to finish it off,I'd say the left is kind of dead for now, barring some old farts who reminisce about Ceausescu and westoid type Anarcho-NATOists in the youth if they have any vaguely leftist sentiment

          I haven't read enough theory to properly say where I fall specifically on the ideological spectrum,but I'd say I'm in the ML ballpark

          People like me are probably very few and far between, especially if you wanna look for socially progressive ML's

          LGBTQ people here have a very hard time and they're only now beginning to see some degree of acceptance in the biggest cities

          I can't speak on the political sentiment in the LGBTQ community here,as I have not had the occasion to really interact with it,but the vibe I got was sadly pro-western and pro-NATO as is the case with most of the youth

          Keep in mind I don't go out much,so this is what I gathered mostly from vibes, interaction with my friend group and reading the news,so it is in no way a comprehensive analysis

          • From the perspective of someone who knows nithing about it, such writeups are invaluable. Trying to research a topic like this casually on today's internet is not easy, so conversations like these mean a lot

      • General Megathread COTW: Romania

    • Most Romanians are nostalgic for Ceausescu. This doesn’t mean they like him or communism, but the neoliberal hell that the ex-communist states devolved to have failed to the point it left many people jaded and reminiscing about one of the worst communist leaders.

You've viewed 1494 comments.