There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage?
There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage?
www.counterpunch.org
There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage?
14 comments
-
Because even if this was implemented, rich assholes will find ways around it.
That house? Oh it's owned by an LLC that rents it from the company I own for $1a month, I then house sit as a second job for $1 a month.
That car? Same deal.
My internet, home phone, electricity, water, insurance and all other home expenses? Paid for by my company as part of WFH rules for executives.
I also have regular business meetings in Hawaii and other overseas locations for business purposes.
-
Don't forget:
Those politicians who are in a position to pass laws with regards to my taxes, income level, and other means of hoarding power? Oh, they're owned by me thanks to legal bribery.
And those other politicians who want to introduce a maximum wage, higher taxes, or anything remotely socialist? Oh, the media outlet/s I own, along with the politicians I've already paid off can easily smear them out of contention.
Both possible because the system is what it does and is designed to encourage these kinds of disparity and inequality, not combat it.
-
-
Under capitalism it would be laughably easy to circumvent, and even in premise it is flawed because it would only target the small number of top CEO's.
The truly rich does not even recive wages.
-
So then tax all capital gains as income. I don't get why capital gains get taxed less than income. If anything they should be taxed more.
-
Goooooood luuuuck with that under the dicatorship of capital.
I don’t get why capital gains get taxed less than income
I mean entire system is even called CAPITALISM, what's unclear about it?
-
-
-
the best way to attempt to implement a maximum wage is to tax the every loving fuck out of anyone make a certain amount ie, you make 10m/year a thats 100% progressive tax.
but it wont happen because humans are weak and the rich have bought the government.
-
I like corporate taxes being tied to the ratio of the highest compensated full time worker and the lowest compensated worker. Note that I specifically said compensation and not wages and full time worker and not employee.
If the highest compensation package is stock options worth 30 million and the lowest compensation is an "independent contractor", that scrapes by on 30k a year. The ratio is 1000, some standard equation would then define the corporate tax rate. Hopefully a ratio that high would be 100%
-
-
i think if you ask that question, itll result in abolishing the minimum wage, in the usa anyway
-
"Let's not play the game of five whys because the fifth why is always 'capitalism.'" ~Stuart Langridge
-
Article is paywalled for me. But the ultra rich CEOs don’t receive much of a wage anyway: they draw a nominal wage and amass most of their wealth via stocks.
14 comments