6d ago

New Poll Recommends Eating the Billionaires

talkingpointsmemo.com New Poll Recommends Eating the Billionaires

I’ve mentioned a few times that Donald Trump is giving Democrats a...

You're viewing a single thread.

95 comments

Doesn't matter now. He's rapidly destroying the regulatory infrastructure and sending his brown shirts out to sow fear and confusion. He is a fascist, the rest of the Republican party are his enablers, and things are going to get super mega shitty before they get better.
If they get better.
- He’s rapidly destroying the regulatory infrastructure and sending his brown shirts out to sow fear and confusion.
  It's literally the playbook from Bush's "Shock and Awe" campaign turned on US citizens (minus the indiscriminate bombing). It amounts to the same thing, though. It's a blitz, do so much so fast it sets everybody off balance and puts them in a state of shock.
  Shock and awe (technically known as rapid dominance) is a military strategy based on the use of overwhelming power and spectacular displays of force to paralyze the enemy's perception of the battlefield and destroy their will to fight.
  Project 2025 wants to shock people into obedience. The flurry of Executive Orders are part of this shock treatment, as are the deportations, and roadblocks suddenly thrown up in front of government agencies. They intend to shock us and cripple our ability to respond via governance.
  EDIT: Turns out, Klein agrees.
  
  Trump is a rolling shock machine, which a recipe for keeping us scattered and reactive to the latest shocking news. There will be moments when we need to react forcefully and meaningfully to protect one another.
  
  It’s literally the playbook from Bush’s “Shock and Awe” campaign turned on US citizens (minus the indiscriminate bombing).
  So far. I do not doubt that we are looking down the barrel of a return to the days when American citizens were bombed by their own government as they did in 1921 and 1985.
  
  Oh yeah, the violence will come. After they've sufficiently shocked everyone into submission. The violence is to perpetuate the submission since shock wears off.
  
  His shock and awe may shock his violence prone brown headed Magas into pulling another 2nd amendment solution on him or his helpers - this time more successfully.
  
  Brown headed?
  Really now.
- He is a fascist, the rest of the Republican party are his enablers
  The rest of the Republican party are his sycophants and subordinates. It's the "moderate" Democrats who are his enablers, through inaction.
  
  The Republicans have the majority in both the House and Senate. To do something, you need power first.
  
  Imagine winning an election and twiddling your fingers for 4 years straight
  
  Honest question: What should they have done, given the makeup of the House and Senate?
  
  Biden should've appointed an AG four years ago who would've actually been motivated to prosecute Trump with a sense of urgency, rather than sitting on his ass for two years before finally appointing a special prosecutor precisely and deliberately after the last moment. (Remember, Merrick Garland was only nominated for SCOTUS in the first place because Obama thought he was so conservative that not even Mitch McConnell could find an excuse to object. That should've made it obvious that he was exactly the wrong choice for AG.)
  Also four years ago (or two years ago, or six years ago, or any even-numbered years ago going back to at least before Bill Clinton's "third way" nonsense, if not the end of LBJ's "Great Society" programs or even the New Deal), the Democrats should've been running more economically-progressive candidates (e.g. Elizabeth Warran, AOC, etc.) instead of neoliberal pro-corporate toadies, so that they could have actually moved the needle on helping the working class instead of leaving them vulnerable to empty promises by fascist demagogues.
  To be very clear, I'm not saying that being socially-progressive was a mistake. In fact I will directly refute that: mainstream Democrats trying to scapegoat being too "woke" as the reason they lost are not only wrong, but lying. What I am saying is that the economic aspects of progressivism, not the social ones, are what would've actually made the difference.
  As for what they should do now as opposed to in the past, other than "obstruct" I don't have a fucking clue because they've already comprehensively failed and it might very well be too late.
- We talkin' about President Elon or his dick sucker, Donald?

95 comments