Skip Navigation

Trump administration will offer all 2 million federal workers a buyout to resign

27 comments
  • "A senior administration official told NBC News that they expect 5%-10% of the federal workforce to quit, which, they estimate, could lead to around $100 billion in savings."

    If they quit now, and are paid for another 8 months, how does that save any money?

    Similarly, if they quit and need to be replaced, you're going to spend more money hiring and training the replacement, so for 8 months you're paying double salary, one for the person who quit and one for their replacement...

    • It's hilarious you think they will be replacing them

      • Look at Musk and Twitter, same pattern.

        1. Fire everyone.
        2. Oh, shit!
        3. Pleasecomebackpleasecomeback
      • Oh they'll be replaced, with "private" workers supplied by Musk, etc.

        The private "workers" will be AI or cheaply paid foreign workers.

        They will be incapable of doing the job, not because they are incompetent, but because they were the lowest bid and lied.

        After 2+ years of doing nothing they'll need to be replaced by more workers. The government can't function without them, so we'll hire twice as many, still paying less than the average American and pocketing the remainder.

        After 4+ years, assuming the administration leaves, they'll all be fired by the new administration and Americans will be brought in. They'll have to do 4+ years worth of backlog plus the current job. After these 4 years they be deemed as incompetent and we'll start the whole cycle over again.

  • This is what it looks like when some of the richest minds that russia can buy brainstorm ways to damage the US.

  • Paying people not to work? Sounds like the Department Of Government Efficiency at work

  • Uh. Without regard to department?

    I mean, okay, if more people resign in department A than B, to some degree you can transfer people, but it's not like there's some generic "federal employee" skillset.

    EDIT: I guess if too many people did leave in one area, that you could re-hire there, and eight months severance isn't actually that large. I guess if someone were that on-the-edge about their job, it might not be that big a deal anyway.

    Maybe it's a standard practice in business layoffs. Not familiar with practice there. You'd rather have people on the edge of leaving leave then people that want to stay.

    I'm also kind of wondering if there are any jobs that hire full-time for limited periods of time, like maybe a Census poll worker. Like, if the government only planned to hire someone for three months and he just extended an offer for eight months severance if they walk out the door, that may wind up being a little awkward.

27 comments