Just edit the config file, so easy!
Just edit the config file, so easy!
![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/8ffe3c47-9439-43da-90df-5a1f9e5f76e9.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![Meme with unfinished horse drawing. Left side the horse drawing is professionally made at the horses back, on the right it looks like a child's stick figure drawing. Caption: "Linux distros be like: GUI for desktop settings (left), GUI for system settings (right).](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/8ffe3c47-9439-43da-90df-5a1f9e5f76e9.jpeg?format=webp)
Let the apologists have a field day in the comments.
Just edit the config file, so easy!
Let the apologists have a field day in the comments.
You're viewing a single thread.
Plasma 6 settings GUI more capable than windows settings idk wym. Only thing I've had to edit in the terminal in the last several months has been automount on a hard drive.
Only thing I’ve had to edit in the terminal in the last several months has been automount on a hard drive.
I just use gnome disks for that. Tbh, that's the only thing I use gnome disks for.
Do they support stuff like managing the bootloader or systemd services by now? So far the only thing I ever saw going that deep was OpenSuse's YaST Settings Suite.
Idk man i just keep my system up to date and call it good for the most part. I COULD dive into low level system stuff but I've rarely has a reason to. I do my tinkering in Godot, or off the computer.
Point stands, better interface and more functionality than Windows' hot mess.
Should note that yes, system stuff like display, fonts, all kinds of other stuff. But super users will always default to command line and there's always a little issue here and there after certain updates to tinker with.
They aren't supposed to have every setting tho. It's mainly focused for average user, power users can figure it out and most prefer CLI anyway. Having too many settings can be intimidating for new users.