Call of Duty admits it's using generative AI to 'help develop some in-game assets', and suddenly all those poorly made calling cards make sense

“We want to pump out more money grabbing live service scam games, so instead of paying artists a fair wage, we’re going to overwork them as well as force them to use ai slop all just to make a line go up slightly steeper”

This is not art, there is no human expression in generative Ai. Only corporate profit and stolen labour.

Isn't it true that AI generated content cannot be copyrighted? I had assumed that ruling would cause big brand owners to avoid it... unless they are documenting every artist's work along the way, admitting to using it sometimes could blow holes in their brand.