Semantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)
Semantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)
Follow Bill and Ted's Law: Be excellent to each other.
And keep it in good humor.
You're viewing a single thread.
View all comments
38
comments
Because he's not listed, Julian.
16 0 ReplyYeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
12 1 ReplyFair enough, I would have given any name that wasn't on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
7 0 ReplyField medic with basic training.
12 0 ReplyInflammable means flammable? What a starship.
6 0 ReplyPermanently Deleted
7 0 Reply
Well, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn't care a lot about ethics either.
6 0 Reply
You've viewed 38 comments.
Scroll to top