FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections
FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections
The Federal Communications Commission has voted to move forward with a plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections. The rules could be re-established as soon as next spring, but the FCC's effort could face legal challenges.
The Federal Communications Commission has voted to move forward with a plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections. The rules could be re-established as soon as next spring, but the FCC's effort could face legal challenges.
You're viewing a single thread.
Cannot wait for this to amount to nothing over the next 12 months and seeing all the
botsvery real people hail it was a win for >!union busting!< Biden come next NovemberI’m not sure why you’re upset about restoring net neutrality but go off I guess
I’m not sure why you’re upset about restoring net neutrality but go off I guess
Because there's a non-zero chance that the service providers will pull the same kinds of stunts that some police departments did in the wake of all of the post-George-Floyd ideas we had about "reform".
The providers will most likely throw a tantrum at the increased regulation and we will get everything from "weaponized incompetence" to "malicious compliance" along with a petulant toddler level of foot-dragging. They will then probably claim that everything that's going wrong with their services is now due to these new choking, stifling, innovation-killing regulations that are none of those things in actuality and then they'll do their level best to lobby things back to their current state at the very least and more likely an even worse state for the consumer.
I'm not saying we SHOULDN'T restore net neutrality to the state it was in, I'm just saying that the providers are probably going to be big babies about it and pass the pain on to the customer.
AT&T, Comcast, Charter, Cox, Verizon, CenturyLink, and T-Mobile have basically invisibly colluded themselves into one big ma bell lookalike by one or more of them setting "market pricing" and waiting for the others to follow suit because "profits".
Why be competitive when you too can rake in record profits by silently agreeing to the rip-off?
The least we can do is limit their ability to pull stunts like marginalizing content they don't get make extra money off of prioritizing.
I can get why someone might not be excited about this because it's going to suck for consumers in the short run and it's really not going to solve the problem at hand, it's just going to do a tiny bit to keep it from progressing even farther into "enshittification" territory as the providers keep moving the pot towards boiling.
Until we remove the ability for corporations to buy legislation, though, the problem will continue.
This is a classic “don’t let perfect be the enemy of good” situation and you’re framing it as if I am against all the things you are calling for.
you’re framing it as if I am against all the things you are calling for
No, and if it came off that way, I apologize. I'm just saying I can see why some people would think this isn't going to be particularly effective in the short term. It's hard to show enthusiasm for a move like this when setting it up in the first place saw things getting repealed and left us where we are now.
Good is absolutely a step in the right direction and we should be taking it in the hopes of getting closer to perfect.
There is a very real chance that since we're heading for an election year, the ISPs can just throttle it in litigation for the next 16 months and should the GOP win, then it's moot.
So you're all in on the ever increasing cost of internet service, then? You are pleased that getting more than 25 mbits requires an extra $30 per month and gigabit rates are well past $150?
Damn. You be you, but I'd rather not be fleeced while they also strip me of my privacy rights.
Thankfully we actually got a competitor here recently and went from $90 for 25mbits up, 5 down to $68 for 1gig up/down.
Yes, that is how bad it is in America. 3 years ago that $90 was $60, after I knocked it down from $90 by dropping my data rate and ditching their minimal cable plan that mostly had shopping channels on it and HBO Max, only viewable on my phone, and I never managed to get it to work.
Their rates consistently go up by up to 10% per year with zero improvements.
I pay like 120 for 2gbit unlimited bandwidth.
I'm jealous. I pay $155/month for two internet services: Old Faithful (10Mb/s DDL, reliable) and New Internet (up to 100Mb/s down (usually only 50Mb/s down due to trees), but flaky thanks to older wireless tech at the tower). I keep the old DSL wh3n the new wireless one flakes out. It's better in Winter (no leaves). They have a new tower they've been building and finishing up for well.after a year now, which supposedly has better tech on it. Just waiting to get swit he'd over to that one...then I belive I'll be actually getting up to 100Mb/s for $135/mo. I hate internet in America.
Net neutrality is a bandaid on a bullet wound at this point. Actually, that's not entirely accurate, it's more like a bandaid on a migraine.
The internet and internet access needs to be nationalized, this isn't 1995, there's no reason the internet should be controlled by a handful of corporations, and no amount of FCC regulation can fix the problems that causes.
Ah yes, the tired, old "perfect being the enemy of good", so let's just let it all go to shit since we can't get it perfect