Second teacher at Missouri school on leave over OnlyFans side hustle: 'It’s working out ok so far'
Second teacher at Missouri school on leave over OnlyFans side hustle: 'It’s working out ok so far'
Another teacher at a Missouri high school was placed on leave after administrators found out she was selling content on OnlyFans, according to a report.
A second teacher at a high school in Missouri was put on leave after administrators discovered her OnlyFans side hustle.
Megan Gaither, 31, said during an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she was placed on leave from her English teaching and varsity cheerleading coach position on Oct. 27 after district officials found out about her account on the OnlyFans platform.
You're viewing a single thread.
Nobody’s biz what she does outside of work. These cunts can fuck off.
This is the logic I use to defend Jonathan Majors
Who the fuck did this chick assault, numbnuts?
Not the argument I'm making. Just that questionable moral choices in people's private lives shouldn't affect employment if the consumer is inherently unaffected by the behavior in their personal lives. I think the more talented you are and the better you are at your job, the more protection you should have. Like, for example, Elvis was so talented he gets a pass for fucking kids. Meryl Streep can choke kittens to death at this point.
I don't actually think Jonathan Majors did anything wrong, even and especially if he got physical with some jealous histrionic drunk slut trying to snoop in his phone. All he did was revoke a pussy pass. He should be considered a feminist icon for that, along with Johnny Depp and Sean Connery. He's too hot and talented to cancel.
but more than anything else, in the same way I want to give the middle finger to moralizing prudes who don't like to admit that teachers are often total sluts, I want to give the middle finger to white knights who want to cancel celebrities for petty arguments.
Or even... hmm... maybe..... maybe both of them engaged in unprofessional behavior unbecoming... nah fuck that I don't care, I just want more superhero movies and porn and don't care about moral hazard.
You're doing a huge smooth brained move by making a false equivalence of "questionable moral choices" between rape and getting naked
The fact that you can't see how these two things are so very far apart shows enough of who you really are.
Rape? You even following the case? He smacked some dumb slut for snatching his phone, and a bunch of other opportunists came wafting up through the sewer grates so it seems like a pattern of behavior. It isn't.
A teacher showing her cervix to the world is a perfectly reasonable thing for parents to not want. There's not a single fucking place on the planet where that's fine.
I'm sorry, did you say cervix?
You either need to go back to school or you have some weird-ass fetish for endoscopy
Definitely the latter. Love the dildo cam. I'm looking for polyps bro.
I don't expect logic or rationality from the crowd you're replying to.
I expect double standards, moving goalposts, and plain ol' cognitive dissonance.
lol, you asshats deserve each other.
It's a one week old account talking to a 3-day-old account. I've got a feeling there's no good faith arguments to be had here.
ding ding
Calm down.
Oh sweetheart I'm not using logic or rationality, Im responding to absurdity with absurdity.
Yet in one of these situations no one was harmed and in another a lot of harm was done to other people.
I don't think anyone was harmed in either situation.
That's not how public school teachers operate.
For example, you're not allowed to be visibly drunk in public if you are a public school teacher.
There are good reasons for this. Teachers are supposed to be role models for students, so seeing one passed out in the gutter isn't acceptable.
If you don't like it, then don't become a public school teacher. There are plenty of other jobs you can do.
Like be a police officer, because we apparently don't give a fuck if they drive drunk.
Eh, Hutch got demoted to transit cop and then quickly got fired from that too, partly due to the drunk driving thing, and good riddance.
Also there was a Minneapolis cop who got busted for having an OnlyFans last month and she still might get fired for it. A cop having an OF isn't one of my many complaints about my local police department.
Not sure how this is relevant.
The job qualifications and contracts are different for police officers than teachers.
It's entirely relevant to your argument. Both are commonly expected to be role models. This expectation is enforced in only one case.
The job qualifications and contracts are different for police officers than teachers.
If officers agreed to terms that prevented them from having an OnlyFans, then you would have a point.
It's not a part of their contract, so why would they be punished for it?
It is a part of a public school teacher's contract, so they aren't allowed to do it.
If they don't like it, they can do something else.
If extra restrictions are being placed on their personal lives they should be paid more to compensate for it.
Public Schools: "The best we can offer is a 'Great Teacher' mug, tissues for your classroom, and a hearty thumbs up! Actually, the budget won't support the mug. Or that tissues. Oh, and in completely unrelated news, the superintendent was just given a 25% raise."
Lol, around easter our admins gathered together to go door to door and deliver plastic easter eggs, one per teacher, with about 5 loose jelly beans inside. Not even good jelly beans.
Like, they're paid twice what we are and they spent a whole day on this.
What do you mean? It's a part of their contract. They can take it or leave it.
And it looks like they're leaving it. Not great when there's a teacher shortage.
Citation?
Prove it.
Saw at least one of my teachers drunk in public basically every night (local bar and grill).
I'm not sure why you're getting down voted when you're right. Most schools put a clause in their contract involving public conduct that can go as far as suggesting what you can't wear during off hours. Teachers jump through a lot of hoops for employment which is why their low salary is always a talking point.
Just because teachers are controlled by schools in other ways doesn't mean that they should be controlled in this way also. Simply saying that teachers can't do X and therefore they ought not be able to do Y is a non-argument.
The argument isn't about control, it's about agreed upon terms in a contract of employment. If she agreed to conduct herself a specific way when she signed her contract and then did the opposite this is a matter of breach of contract. Should schools hold their employees to such standards is a different conversation than should an employer hold an employee accountable when they break the terms they agreed to.
To frame the situation in another light, despite being a room full of adults who can consent it's generally regarded as a terminatable offense if a college professor has a relationship with a student, even when both parties are consenting. With that in mind should it be acceptable for a teacher of under aged students to generate content of a sexual nature with the intent of mass distribution? Students in her school/class will inevitably gain access to that content and now you have a situation where a highschool teacher has exposed themself to children. With that in mind this seems like the kind of thing you'd consider an improper act of conduct.
People don't want to acknowledge facts they don't like.
In this case I think it is.
It's not that she's a sex worker that's the issue it's the fact that teens can barely keep their head clear is they have a cute teacher they could picture naked. That effect would be 1000% worse if you can simply give your teacher five bucks to slap her kitty while saying your a great student.
This is like blaming the victim for being shot. It's a 100% the guy with the gun
It's not at all the same.
In this case she would be the victim and the shooter. She shot herself in the foot, there are hundreds of ways to spoliate identity effectively on onlyfans and she chose not to. She knew her fan ase and took advantage then claimed to be the victim.
If it weren't a teacher pandering customized pornography to underage school children would it be ok? I'm gunna guess no, it's essentially pedophilia at distance.
You don't understand the language you are using. Maybe stop using it?
That's not an argument, that's an attempt to sound intelligent without actually making a point of saying anything intelligent.
They could just as easily AI her face onto some chick banging 16 dudes.
Correct. I'm not saying I agree with it but I am saying I understand the reasoning.