Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation

www.macrumors.com Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation

Apple recently claimed that Safari is three different browsers in effort to avoid regulation in the European Union (via The Register). The claim...

Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation::Apple recently claimed that Safari is three different browsers in effort to avoid regulation in the European Union (via The Register). The claim...

Europe @feddit.de sv1sjp @lemmy.world 1 yr. ago

Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation in EU

www.macrumors.com /2023/11/04/apple-argued-safari-is-three-different-browsers/

27 comments

"The European Commission went on to point out that Safari's functionality and underlying technologies are near-identical across platforms. The Commission even highlights Apple's own marketing materials for its Continuity feature, which appear to contradict the company's claims, touting the tag line "Same Safari. Different device." As a result, the Commission rejected Apple's claim and insists that "Safari qualifies as a single web browser, irrespective of the device through which that service is accessed.""

Chef's Kiss

Governments and stately instances so rarely have a proper grasp of technology. This is beautiful.
On example cited by Apple is Safari's sidebar feature on iPadOS and macOS, allowing users to see opened tabs, tab groups, bookmarks, and browsing history. Since this feature is unavailable in the version of Safari for iOS, Apple claimed that it is a distinctly different browser.

😂
- So they're also claiming iOS on an iPhone and iOS on an iPad are separate products? In for a penny, in for a pound, I guess.
  
  They did rename it to iPad OS, so yes
- Wow, then even chrome can claim that they don't support Extension ok Mobile thus it's different product. Big Brain Time from apple.
Safari

Safari Pro

Safari Pro Max
Apple claimed repairing your Mac with 3rd party parts turns it into a PC so you can't resell it as a Mac.
Ah, there's where all the creativity went to.
Apple needs to allow non-webkit browsers on iOS.
- So iOS can be full of Chromium based browsers.
  
  let's be honest, most people will still use safari. Just let people use Firefox, damn it
Of course they did. Microsoft tried this in the 90's with Internet Explorer, Outlook, and Explorer. Sure, it does three different things, but it's the SAME THING.
- Those are actually different things and always have been. I don't know what point you think you're making.
  
  I think the reference was to IE4 for Windows 95 and 98, which did in fact run the desktop and file manager functions with IE to enable web functionality. You could type a URL into the file manager path bar and use it as a web browser or use a web page as your desktop, IIRC.
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_4
  
  You should be a lawyer.
“Are you getting it? These are three separate browsers.” - Anonymous
So much for "we care about your privacy"

We all know that was BS but the isheep sadly believe it.
- What does this have to do with privacy
  
  They are trying to avoid regulation. That's super dodgy. They are trying to hide something. Since it's related to a browser, data collection must be what they want to regulate, and what Apple is trying to hide....
I'm a big fan of Apple's products, but this is some serious bullshit. Fuck off.
Apple bullshittery again

You've viewed 27 comments.