That's not what this is though. You aren't emphasizing how "after" it was. You aren't distinguishing it from some sort of "before-after". This is just a typo.
ok. never heard of that. the more you know i guess. but I'd say that it is totally unnecessary in this case and a bit of a stretch. or maybe I don't fully understand it. it's 2 am where i live and I'm tired. so i could totally be wrong 😅 maybe i give it another try tomorrow.