I've heard some schools are reintroducing it now, but that doesn't help those that never learned.
I've heard some schools are reintroducing it now, but that doesn't help those that never learned.
I've heard some schools are reintroducing it now, but that doesn't help those that never learned.
I don't remember people ever writing cursive like what I was taught growing up. People just self-servingly turbo-scribble some chicken-scratch and call it a day. The kid who can't read our B-movie elvish script isn't the one with literacy issues.
We either write within the ballpark of standardization, or we don't. I think kids should be required to put in as much effort into learning cursive, as people put into actually writing cursive. Which is to say, absolutely none at all.
(Sorry to people who actually write legible, clean cursive. I wish I got to read your output in the wild.)
The thing is, it's easy to read good cursive. It's just another script. It took me 5 episodes of Last Exile to memorize the Greek equivalents to English letters so I could read all the text without looking up the translation guide. But when their writing looks like Jack Lew's signature, there's not a whole lot I can do to decipher it
Yes but really only the artistically minded and those with great manual dexterity have even a slim chance of doing it well. The rest has to write letters hundreds of times while their classmates go to recess.
feels like a lot of older people just use cursive as an excuse to cover up bad handwriting, because it's harder to tell when it's all squiggly in the first place
like, there's a reason we don't write in fancy serif typefaces, that would result in most people's writing being even less legible than it already is.
I used to have really legible, accurate cursive. Someone made me feel embarrassed for still using cursive in middle school, so I stopped using it.
Now I can't remember cursive well enough to use it quickly, and my print looks like an elementary child did it. ALL CAPS print is a good way for me to make my print more legible
turbo-scribble some chicken-scratch and call it a day
But that's cursive, isn't it? I always considered cursive the script to be written when you just quickly need to write something down,being the style where the pen is raised the least, which happens to be the fastest way to write, at the cost of legibility. So cursive to me seems like the opposite of fancy.
You're just not old enough. Cursive was everywhere when I was a kid. They should still teach it to children because children learn language and writing easier than adults do. We should be able to read cursive. It is part of our language, and our history. Every old document is written in cursive. We shouldn't end up with a society that can't even read its original Constitution. That's just Idiocracy.
I grew up in a house with a rotary phone and a meticulously maintained phone book (written in cursive.) If I'm too young to have been able to reliable hone my cursive-parsing skills, what can we expect of younger generations?
The Flynn effect suggests people are generally getting smarter, remembering things better, etc. Something is happening to cause younger generations to be generally better than their ancestors. IQ scores have their problems but it's still a hopeful sign.
Language changes. Teaching an entire script to be able to read translated documents when there are practical skills that could be taught instead is silly.
We don't teach old English anymore, even though there's a huge amount of our cultural history contained in it.
We don't even teach people about the eras when we used to use "f" in place if "s", and that's right in the middle of the constitution.
Can you read the original magna carta? America would not be unique amongst English speaking nations in having issues dealing with language drift.
lol mixing up language with its orthography system. Classic error
It's not that I never learned how to read cursive; it's that nobody actually writes it legibly.
Facts. Everybody's "personal flair" on their style of cursive becomes a cryptographic puzzle. I exclusively used cursive until about 7th grade (because it was faster to me), and I still have to decipher most handwritten cursive
Literally the only reason I use any cursive is because it's useful to distinguish when you're doing a lot of letter math for physics or calculus.
That and being able to give people thank you cards with immaculate penmanship, still don't use full cursive for that though, just slow deliberate writing with a bit of italic flair.
Ironically enough I developed my modern handwriting style basically as an act of spite against a professor I was especially cross with in my junior year.
Old bastard comes into class and yells at us about how we're the worst scoring class he's ever had and then expects me to not be in the front row visibly anger practicing my letters.
Cursive fonts should at least be consistent.
Conservatives are trying to prevent kids from learning history and sex ed, and we're still hearing this bullshit lamentation about CURSIVE?
Schools are underfunded, teachers are underpaid and overworked, students are graduating barely able to read and with no critical thinking skills.
Who in their right mind is actually concerned about kids learning cursive?
Things I'd rather schools focus on:
Typing, Personal finance, Current events, Technology literacy, Graphic design, Human Computer Interaction
Or maybe practical skills related to trades or how to fix things: CAD, Cooking, Electrical, Plumbing
Literally ANYTHING but this cursive crap. It's useless, it's dead, move on.
To be fair, it's trivially easy to learn cursive and it's basically always been an extension of penmanship.
But why do children need to be required to learn it when there are more pressing skills that they need?
Why is penmanship anything that we care about now? Who writes things outside of notes?
How are you supposed to do any of this when your brain hemispheres aren't connected? If you don't link your letters, you ain't wire your brain cells. /s
I once saw a post on Facebook claiming this unironically. I learned cursive (or a simplified version I think) in school and thought it's still the standard until I saw the Facebook post and was like "so what". How can people get so emotional about such details? Teach your kid cursive at home when it's so important for you! Oh, you don't have kids but a strong opinion about education? Share it on Facebook! I'm not there anymore and for a while now.
Absolutely they need to teach finance. I remember when I had to get a mortgage for my house and it was a complete slog because I had absolutely no idea how the whole process was supposed to work. The thing is its actually not that complicated, but because I didn't know what I was doing it took forever and was stressful.
My tiny quibble with your post is that I wish you had included critical thinking in your first list. Other than that this is spot on.
That being said, my kids are learning cursive and I'm happy for it. It's not something that requires years of in depth study to learn. My third grader is only a few months into school and can already read and write cursive after just starting it this year.
But if it were gone, I wouldn't bat an eye.
How to pay taxes and make a budget. Media literacy. Nutrition. How to drive a car. Coding. The list goes on and on.
When teaching how to drive a car they need to teach the skill of actually looking and processing what's happening rather than just the mechanics of how to operate the vehicle.
Most people seem to drive along without any real awareness of what's happening around them which is what causes most accidents. Sure, that car shouldn't have pulled out in front of you from a side road, but if you'd been paying attention you would have been able to see they were doing it, and avoided the crash.
Now I may be a bit biased, but it would be nice if people could read my hand writing. There are just some people that write in cursive despite it not being taught. It was mentioned once in 2nd grade for me and for some reason it stuck.
Well cursive helps people with dyslexia
Not being able to write cursive I understand.
Not being able to read cursive is an issue that will out your lesser education and put you at a disadvantage in social situations.
How many social situations do you get into where cursive is relevant? Wedding table cards? Pretty sure even people not taught cursive can get the gist since most letters are pretty close to print.
Find better friends, in that case.
I learned cursive a good 20 years ago in third grade, haven't used it since outside of signing my name and deciphering the odd handwritten letter from someone 40+ who still writes in cursive (and still handwrites letters)
*In the US? I don't think think is a thing at all in Vic Australia. I can't read cursive, and am slightly above averagely educated for my country (honours).
In Victoria Australia practically no one uses cursive, and the joined handwriting they (used to / or maybe still do) teach in Victorian schools is basically just printed text with minor alterations to make it join better. They don't mandate a specific form of writing AT ALL in highschool (years 7-12**). Hence why I switched to writing as close to printed text as possible, slightly joined for some extra speed.
People should write in a way that's legible first, speed second (when you want others to actually be able to read)
If you write in cursive here, no one can read what you're writing.
Nothing to do with your level of education, and frankly, anyone who hasn't STOPPED using illegible writing styles by the time they finish an undergrad degree at the latest, I'd look at sideways for being unnecessarily difficult (obviously, if they can't write any better, then fair enough).
**Because there is one year or "prep", it's actually years 8-13
This is so puzzling to me, here in Brazil everyone writes in cursive, we all learned fine as children, it exists because it's easier and faster to write with it and you are going to write a lot during all your school life.
One thing I've picked up from these threads over time is that different places mean different things by "cursive".
In some places it's treated as "how to write legibly by hand quickly" and in others it's more of a formal writing system designed for signatures and the like.
For example, we were required to use it while learning it, and then told not to use it for handwritten assignments once we left elementary school. It was preferred that things were written using print or typed was strongly preferred.
Kids now don't even have to write by hand as much, because typing is a vastly more practical skill.
In the US, my kids have done most assignments online since middle school. They’ve never needed cursive except for the brief refresher every year, and the occasional legal thing, such as a signature card to get a bank account.
Although, I’m amused that my kid in 11th grade now has to hand-write some assignments for the first time, as a reaction to generative ai.
Can someone explain why one cannot read cursive? It is just a tilted (sometimes fancy) font, what's so hard about it?
Edit: After being made aware by a fellow lemmy'er and googling it, it seems I confused cursive with italics, English is not my first language. Though I learned cursive at school when I was 6 without realizing it is called cursive in English. It was part of the basic curriculum at that time, didn't know this wasn't a thing in other countries.
There are some wonky letters, like capital G, S where if you never learned you wouldn't know what you're looking at.
As someone who didn't learn English as a first language, cursive is like another language to me. I don't recognize half of the letters, and i never encountered it enough to properly learn it or have an incentive to learn it.
It's not though like why the fuck is s a triangle that's the only thing I know about it and can't read it
I think at one point a cursive S was "draw an S without lifting your pen from one letter to another" so it comes out looking a bit like an 8. Then the top loop got smaller and smaller, until the one guy who codified the cursive alphabet just didn't put the top loop on at all.
This same guy for some reason decided capital Q should look like a 2.
If I were in charge of the curriculum, students would get an introduction to cursive and an afternoon playing with it, basically so they can recognize it as a "font" and read it. Then let them continue to print or more likely type their work.
I was similarly confused when I first learned about this. We were never taught to write in “print”, so handwriting - cursive - was the norm.
I mean the problem isn't whether they taught cursive or not, it's whether you actually use it or not. Cause I was taught cursive in school but barely know how to write it now cause I never have to use it.
I'm nearing 40 and haven't been required to write in cursive since grade school. Don't every use it unless more than a word or two a year probably. I have no problem writing in it on occasion. It's just curvier versions of letters that you link by not picking your pen up. Sure, there are some weird capital letters, but generally, knowing the concept is enough to get it mostly right. I don't really understand how some people struggle.
She's talking about students not being able to read it.
Right, which would be a use of it.
Its purpose has passed. We don't write with quills or dip pens anymore. Franky, we don't write by hand much at all. Maintaining two systems of writing when handwriting is rapidly being reduced makes no sense. Your situation (I'm the same) is a great demonstration.
I'd say cursive is the Roman numerals of penmanship. It's a quaint thing to use for style, but that's it.
It isn't just cursive. I've seen a lot of younger people have issues reading bad copies of older print letters. Part of it isn't being used to seeing information presented in a certain way or not being found via OCR.
Fuck cursive. Being forced to write in that was absolute torture. The forced use of specific esoteric hand-cramping illegible scribbles is asinine.
There surely was a use for penmanship before the proliferation of ballpoint pens and typewriters, but the way it was taught while I was in school was completely backwards. The intent of writing in script is to quickly flow from one letter to another without needing to lift the nib of a quill; rote learning of individual hieroglyphs with full disregard for the writer's natural hand movements is at best asinine, and at worst cruel.
The fact that we were tormented decades in the past doesn't justify more torment now. Be better.
I find cursive is very useful when writing notes that only I will ever need to read. Reading and writing another persons cursive has never been easy for me and it has never impacted my life with one exception. I cannot read post cards from my aunt. Oh, and that time a decade ago when I had to fill out the "I will not cheat" pledge on the back of the SAT.
Turns out if you need to write something with speed we have these things that are like typewriters, but they don't even jam!
Oh, and that time a decade ago when I had to fill out the "I will not cheat" pledge on the back of the SAT.
One of the hardest sections of the SAT, right there
I was taught cursive and I do not remember it being anything like that. I am sorry for your experiences but I assure you they are not universal
Cursive is dumb anyways. Let's have a second way to write that's harder To do, less legible, and designed for old school fountain pens no one uses that have difficulty with upstrokes
Let's all go back to learning shorthand!
This is what my arthritic handwriting looks like anyway...
Weird they call it shorthand. That looks like a lot of writing just to say "Gregg."
Harder to do? The whole point of cursive is for easier writing. Writing print by hand is what makes no sense. It's more legible, but print is called print for a reason.
On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be a standard for cursive in the US. When I learned to write in 1st grade in my country, there was an official cursive alphabet and everybody learned the same one. But my daughter started learning cursive now in the US (3rd grade) and because the letters she's learning are very different from the ones I learned, I looked up what American cursive looks like. Every single source I found on the subject had a different alphabet.
Harder to write? It's easier and faster. I take it you don't know how to write cursive?
It certainly wasn't in the 3rd grade and it isn't now
It takes significantly more effort and has poor results.
It's way faster and super easy...
Harder to read, but easier to write.
And not that it matters but there are still fountain pen users, makers, influencers and all that, it's a niche hobby now.
I use fountain pens on the daily and would never dream of trying to do cursive.
The only times I used cursive was to sign my name on important documents. Now I don't even do that anymore. I just write my name with normal letters without lifting the pen.
My signature is anything from a sine to cosine wave. Doesn't matter as long as it's sined.
It's just a phase you're going through.
Signing just means write your name but real fast ad sloppy
I just use a specific sort of squiggle that only I can reproduce and have used it for decades.
When I turned 18 and had to sign my social security card with my full name, I had to look up how to do the capital letter in my middle name in cursive because the last time I wrote one was in third grade in the early 2000's
I thought cursive was the American word for joined up handwriting, but reading this thread I don't really get what it means.
No, you're right. That's just called cursive here.
From what I understand after reading a bunch of calligraphy books (both modern and 19th century), there two ways to use the word. Most Americans use the word cursive to mean some form of joined writing, usually something like business penmanship (or a business script). These are usually descendants from English roundhand and spencerian.
However the word can also be used to describe a scale between cursive and gothic. The more gothic a script is the more times the penman lifts their pen. The more cursive a script is, the less the pen will be lifted off the page.
In this thread:
Americans: Why do I need to learn it when I can just type?
The World: It's literally just writing. You don't want to learn how to write??
My kids are learning cursive and I'm glad they are doing so.
But one of the main point of cursive was to be able to write more quickly, and typing has absolutely replaced that need, many times over. And also you learn print first, so not learning how to write cursive doesnt mean you don't learn to write.
Ironically, your post is supposed to be insulting Americans for not being smart, but God damn is the point fucking stupid and ignorant.
It wasn't meant to be insulting to Americans, the hate for learning to join up letters and write quickly just doesn't really make sense to the rest of us.
You know what's stupid and fucking ignorant? Assuming everyone has a laptop on them all the time. Do people really not write notes anymore? Handwriting notes is much more conducive to learning than typing and is a basic skill that aids education at all levels.
I see some comments of people angrily hating cursive, and that's something a bit weird to me. Why the hate?
personally i'm left handed so school-taught cursive was much harder for me to write and t never got faster than block-letters (not sure what to call it, to me handwriting means non cursive and i would specify cursive but i know in other parts of the world that's different so in this message i'll use "block letters" to specific non-cursive) assuming i ever needed to read stuff again.
but i think the main reason people hate it because a lot of people have terrible cursive handwriting. if it took the writer 25% less time to write but it takes the reader 2x as long to read... that's fuckin annoying lol. i'm all for people using it for their personal notes but there's a LOT of people who shouldn't be using cursive for anything anyone else has to read.
I used to do data entry for the post office and the number of people who addressed their letters with terrible cursive was way too high. the OCR could interpret most block-letter handwritten addresses but it couldn't handle as many of the cursive ones because the characters are more ambiguous. often to read people's cursive you need to use more context (ex. disambiguating through the words around it) which just isn't possible for an address.
for people using "block letters" the OCR would only fail on like, cards for grandma addressed by little kids and times when the scan cropped out the edge of the writing. but we got tons of shitty cursive handwriting.
i later delivered mail for the post office and the distribution of block-letter vs cursive style handwriting was very different - more block-letter than cursive. making the overrepresentation of cursive amongst illegible addresses during my data entry time even more significant. it's not a perfect sample data set but i keyed thousands of letters per day during the data entry job and when i did delivery i'd say dozens of the letters i sorted were addressed by hand most days so it was enough enough to give me strong opinions.
Because it's impossible to read. Seriously it's just random squiggles It could be in Arabic for all I know.
If you want to write notes to yourself in cursive go ahead I don't care but as soon as you need to communicate with other members of the human race it's inappropriate. Especially if you also have poor handwriting.
Well it’s not “just writing”, it’s a second, wholly distinct type of writing from our primary form of writing, and its use is usually reserved for writing personal letters, which is something nobody actually does anymore.
If “cursive” has no meaning to you because it’s “just how you write”, then you have your explanation for why Americans don’t like it. We’re taught to write in print for everything important. And that means that everything important that we read is also in print. So cursive is just an extraneous form of writing, that the reasons to use are shrinking by the day.
I write exclusively in cursive. It's natural for me and everyone around me was taught it as well.
For me I was taught cursive in elementary school, but it felt like I couldn't keep up writing assignments so i just stuck with printing which evolved to chicken scratch notes.
Same here. I eventually ended up with disability accommodations for handwriting since my fine motor skills suck so bad I literally can't legibility write to save my life
I hate cursive.
I hate "formal" cursive, but the concept is solid -- economy of motion, or time, or whatever. In fact, I've realized that some of my printing looks like cursive if I write quickly. Cursive that just looks pretty can go fuck itself.
Agreed.
I had to learn it in elementary school, and for some extended amount of time, all schoolwork had to use it. Then for a while after that (a few years) some teachers would still require it. Best part was when they'd critique your handwriting too, so it was an aspect of your work that you didn't gain points for, but that you could certainly lose points. I remember one poor girl that came in to our district in like 6th grade, after we'd already had all our training in it. She turned in a paper and I guess was just supposed to know not to print. The teacher made her redo it in cursive...and then didn't like the way she drew a certain letter (different than how the school taught it), so she started subtracting a point for each time that letter appeared or something, so this girl ended up with like a -2 out of 10 or some shit. I guess the issue was worked out somehow but I remember even as a kid thinking "wow what a dick move".
As soon as the requirements from teachers stopped, I quit using cursive and have never once ever needed to use it since (aside from my signature).
Not once.
It's something interesting to learn and I think it's definitely worth teaching kids how to read it and how to write with it themselves...but it should be something that's like...a few weeks of instruction per year, from grades 3-5. Not all year, not required in all subjects. Just "a few weeks each year, we teach the kids this skill and then give them a refresher". Maybe require it in "cursive month" each of those years, and certainly accept it anytime. But way less emphasis than my school put on it.
Americans why are they like this?
Faster and easier than copying a typeface.
"Omg it's so hard. It might as well be in Chinese "
Oh no, this clock has hands, how am I supposed to know what time it is? Why can't it just display the time?
Ok... 21:35
Wait, not like that!
"Omg it’s so hard. It might as well be in Chinese "
Chinese Simplified enters the chat
A great deal of our education system is intended to coerce us into acting a certain way. We are rushed the cursive and told as children that its useless because we can't use it on essays in school.
We are taught languages slowly, rote, and in a very boring way so that we learn a lot but never become fluent.
Most of all, we are taught that math is highly abstract and useless, because math is one skill that can raise someone working class to being worth a very high wage.
The only time I ever use cursive is when I write my signature, and it's mostly just loops and squiggles.
Meh...cursive shouldn't be a compulsory lesson. It should be part of art or advanced lit. It just not a necessary skill these days.
I can see your argument, but would disagree with where. Cursive is really not meant to be artistic: that’s covered by calligraphy. There’s no reason to cover it in advanced lot: I suppose if you’re researching original sources like journals, you’d need to know, but that puts it at college level.
The most important thing people still need cursive for is a signature, but we don’t teach basic life skills anymore, plus a signature doesn’t seem to need to be recognizable anymore
That being said, I do think it should be taught for a bit longer. Ts still the most efficient way to take notes, it’s still in common use by previous generations, plus the all important signature
I think it should still be taught, but maybe just do it in a higher grade and don't treat it as an important lesson.
It's honestly something where you can learn 95% of it just by seeing it over and over again.
So what do you do, write all caps ?
Architects be like
From what I understand cursive was supposed to help children practice fine motor control. But now that our main ways of communicating with one another involve using one's fine motor control let alone anyone who's touched a gaming system of any kind the cursive is kinda superfluous
pretty sure the point of cursive was that you can write it real quickly without lifting the pen, especially useful with older stuff like fountain pens where you can get blobbage when lifting and placing it.
I had fine motor control problems as a child and cursive did NOT help. It was painful and maddening.
We learned cursive in second grade, meaning that when I was eight years old I knew how to write in cursive. Now I can still read it, but have very little idea of how to write it.
I just write in an weird cursive-print hybrid, which combined with my left handedness, renders my writing completely illegible to anyone but me.
Built-in encryption.
As in, joined-up writing?
Not quite the same. Some of us were taught stuff like this
Fancy. The lowercase letters are mostly how I would write them, but some of the uppercase ones are a lot more flowery.
I don't actually knew what "cursive" meant, searched it and I was today years old when I learned that "cursive" is everybody's handwriting around here. Why should it be different? Nothing is quicker. Ask my doc.
Where are you from?
This thread has taught me (an American) that a lot of countries don't seem to separate "print" vs "cursive" as much as we do.
Same thing with me, in Romania. For me writing in cursive is way faster and easier, I only write in text that looks like what I type if I wanna draw something computer related. Normally I only write in cursive or ALL CAPS
Because cursive writing can’t be used in most cases where Americans would write.
It doesn't help anyone. It's an antiquated skill that's only being brought back to pander to the boomer class.
It doesn't, but it does look nice.
I'm for cursive classes being preserved as part of caliphary classes or for historians (at least reading).
So's the lightsaber :P But seriously, I consider it almost in the same vein as reading paper books. Inefficient, but for some people there is real joy in it.
Because of my very cool physical visual learning cognitive style, I write everything down in notebooks. I wish I'd been introduced to cursive earlier - there's a kind of a jazz to the lettering, where everyone develops their own style over time. Capital letters in particular offer a lot of play in what you can get away with and still be able to say, "ah yes, that's a 'G'."
It's like writing but add 15% doodling to it.
I was taught how to do joined up writing I. Primary school (no idea if that's cursive though) as soon as I was told in secondary school that I didn't have to write joined up, I stopped. I've always struggled reading cursive, if I play a game and it has it for journals then I can't read it at all. Especially when it's older style cursive like from the 1800s or early 1900s.
if I play a game and it has it for journals then I can't read it at all
I greatly appreciate all the games that have the feature to see the text of these types of things in a standard font. I appreciate the design/immersion of using cursive or handwritten text, too, but allowing me to consume it in a much more legible format is a very welcome feature.
That's so weird. All through middle school we were expected to write in cursive so that's all I write in.
There are many old documents written in hieroglyphs. Most people have come across hieroglyphs at one point or another. I don't think most people wold benefit from being taught hieroglyphs in their childhood.
This mf thinks joining letters together are comparable to an entirely different language with an alphabet made from rudimentary pictures.
How the hell can be people so illiterate??
Not being able to read cursive is not being illiterate
Shit, I was taught it and sometimes go "wait what's that letter again"
How can you no read cursive? It's just regular letters!
The ruling class made it a priority to bring back facism it's way easier when you don't read. The 'Well do you want your starbucks person to do a good job' doesn't apply when you only select train your 3rd cousin to be your personal chef.
So why fund education for the peons in the mines? They can choose their choices with fear, as is tradition.
If you look at the actual education that fascists are getting rid if, it's books about race and LBGT, not cursive
I hate how way more school districts (at least in North America) insist on teaching kids cursive than the ones that teach kids how to touch type.
Which skill do you reckon they'll find more valuable in their adulthood?
They should be learning them both. All of this discussion of "why not this instead of that" is wrong, because the children should be learning it all.
There is not a known limit to the amount of things a human being can learn. Each and every one of us should be trying to learn more, all the time. The more skills you have, the better.
You could learn to both type and write cursive, but you could also learn to both type and make balloon animals. Cursive writing in the U.S. doesn’t serve much of a purpose academically. I learned cursive as a child and have since forgotten because the moment I left elementary school there was never any reason to use it. Only cursive I use is to sign my name.
But does touch typing really require teaching? I learned to touch type just by typing. Gained my muscle memory naturally during regular usage.
I will say I hated being told to use home row in school, think that was only in one class though. Luckily the teacher only ever walked around every now and then. My hands were too big for home row placement.
This was slightly less than 2 decades ago, so computers were only in the computer lab and a few computer classes. This was mid aughts.
Touch typing does in fact require teaching. In the UK alone, only 20% of people can touch type fluently (https://touchtypeit.co.uk/just-how-many-people-can-touch-type). In the US, I saw a stat somewhere that was even lower at 10%, but I can't find it again. I wouldn't be surprised if that's accurate though.
Image Transcription: Twitter Post
Jessica Malone Grider, @mrs_g_rider
Please stop using cursive fonts for YA book covers. I can't get them to circulate because the teens can't read cursive.
I'm gen z and learned cursive, so I don't know what generation didn't.
Younger millennial here, I "learned" cursive for like a few weeks in 3rd grade or something but never used it.
I re-taught myself how to write in cursive a couple years ago when I got really into the fountain pen hobby. Still don't really use it for anything lol.
Yeah, my kids are GenZ and also did. I think it was intensive for a short time in elementary school, but they have revisited at least once every year. They”know” cursive in that they can read it if it is neat enough and can laboriously spell out their name.
I have no idea if that means anything for a legal signature, but I’m tempted to make them write me a check so they have some idea what a signature is for
Signatures don't even need to be cursive honestly. My signature is my first and middle initials superimposed + my last name in "cursive"; it's really my last initial, followed by some squigglies that don't really spell anything. So my whole signature looks cursive-ish but no one could tell my name from looking at it. And that's fine because that's not really what it's used for anymore. It's more like a logo than anything else.
I just write really fast and messy and I've never had a problem.
Some States are ditching cursive requirements but it's recent, probably because anyone old enough to be in government office is old enough to still like cursive
Don't lower yourselves to the lowest denominator.
Please use only Noto Sans Linear A Bold Size 42 for cover
The other end of the spectrum would be block lettering like old architectural documents usually had.
those who never learned
FTFY
"that" can be used instead of both "who" and "which"
People need to know cursive, it's part of our language. Most languages have this.
And learn METRIC already you heathens!!!
And learn METRIC already you heathens!!!
Who cares, we let parts of language go all the time, it's served its purpose now it's time to move on
And learn METRIC already you heathens!!!
I think these days, most US schools teach it. They did to us in the '80s and '90s, though we originally planned to go metric until Regan I think killed it. We definitely were using it in the late '90s in all our science-related classes and I'm sure that's still true today.
The downside isn't the learning bit, it's that nothing else uses it daily. I found the switch mostly painless (m/s for wind was a bit odd to me at first, but I like it at this point) and I think most people would be fine. I think older folks will have a hard time ballparking things in metric, at least for a while, as their minds are already using another system to estimate. That will fade, however.
A huge problem is all the signs and stuff that need to be replaced. The US is huge and has many, many streetsigns including in small areas that really don't have the money to do anything about it. On the whole in the longterm, going metric would have far more benefits than problems.
technically, I think all US government does use it in many regards and all US Customary Units are pinned to metric, but it's not used by everyday people.
Turns out that cursive is just a terrible way of writing. Yes, some people think it looks fancy but in terms of functionality it's absolute garbage.
What?
It's hard to write and hard to read. The forced joining of every single letter in a word quicky makes it unintelligible unless your handwriting is perfect or you write very slowly
Cursive was a useless idea.
its so much faster and gentler on your wrists. Cursive is excellent for note taking and essay writing.
I find my printing to be awful and others find it hard to read. Despite spending decades doing it. But cursive took little effort to learn and I can easily improve my form by filling a page with circles and half-sized circles. As a result my cursive is even, easy to read and write.
Or...people can stop being catered too because they are uneducated. I'm sick of things being dumbed down to suit the lowest common denominator.
Cursive is a pointless and outdated system that needs to die.
to*
Blame phones. Again, catering to the lowest in terms of function
Normally I’m totally on the side of the younger generations as I see how tough things have been made for them- this however, I have no sympathy for.