Spez talks to NY Times
Spez talks to NY Times
As the social media site matures, its users and moderators have made their displeasure about corporate changes known, putting the company into a bind.
Article is very biased towards Reddit the Company, and actively paints the protesting mods as being the sole instigators of the protest, calling them "super mods" which has a negative connotation, and makes no mention of the fact that many users and communities are also in support of said protest. It also paints the protesters as immature by positing the "question" of will the community "let [reddit] grow up", implying that the protesters are stifling the growth of reddit. It is very sympathetic towards spez and calls the reddit community "rambunctious", as if the reddit community are children, and only quotes negative examples of notable things the reddit community has achieved. It writes of the protests as if it's a child's temper tantrum that will go away with time.
The article paints the death of the Apollo app as the main reason for the protest, other than the one line of "Old-timers were also angry that the heady days of Reddit’s anticapitalist roots seemed to be officially over.", which is inaccurate. It makes no mention of the many other reasons the community is unhappy and protesting, which includes, among others:
- the lack of accessibility features and proper moderation tools in the official app,
- the perceived dishonesty on the part of Reddit the Company,
- and the loss of faith in Reddit the Company in general.
It also doesn't state the true reason why people were upset about the death of Apollo and other 3PAs, which is that those apps had the accessibility features and moderation tools that the official reddit app should have had but doesn't, and the loss of these 3PAs means that the already back-breaking job of moderation is only going to get harder. It makes no mention of the fact that the unhappiness over the API pricing was due to the ridiculous price and the short time frame, instead painting these "apps like Apollo" as leeches that "send no money back to the company".
tldr: article is very biased toward spez, making him seem like a sympathetic parent trying to control his rebellious children, generalising all protesting mods as bad "super mods", and does not mention the real issues of the protest.
Pretty much all the media handling of this has been far too lenient on reddit, and far too happy to be critical towards moderators.
They mention in that article how reddit was strongly free-speech, but failed to address the fact that they are very far from that now
... and they totally omitted Aaron Swartz as a founder.
The actions of Reddit the last few years (and especially the last few months) have probably increasingly caused Aaron to spin in his grave so much that he could power Los Angeles and San Francisco both with his beyond-the-grave outrage if anyone cared to harness that energy source.
Also a meh article, with spelling and grammatical errors (deliberate?) and omitting even simple details.
Not even mentioning Schwartz was a huge indicator that this is a bullshit paid-for story from Reddit/Spez. Absolutely NOBODY who would bring up the founding of Reddit without mentioning Schwartz unless they were paid not to. This is a hack piece from a paid shill.
The link doesn't work, how about posting the text of the article?
Fuck spez!
What a disgusting article. I wonder how much spez paid for it, or if the author (apparently a 'longtime Redditor') had his account threatened. That, or maybe he's just so used to corporate bootlicking that his first response to seeing a distressed billionaire was to start lapping at his soles.
Also, this puff piece reeks of arrogance. We fucking made that website what it was, and now this pathetic weasel thinks he no longer needs us? And there's dumbasses on Reddit who defend this shit???
Permanently Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Spez has 2000 employees and nobody that can run a server.
According to his comments, he paying for server time. If he is not lying (and lying would also be making material false statements ahead of an IPO - even rich people go to jail for stealing from rich people) he a spending $10 million per year for just the Apollo traffic. That means he is paying 100s of millions per year total.
For that spend a decent CEO would bring that in house.