1年前

Spoderman

您正在查看单个对话串。

167 评论

Interesting. Most liberals I know already agree with that sentiment without having to be told.
- It's true not all liberals support this, but I've certainly seen a fair number hand-waving Biden's vocal support of this genocidal state as if it's no big deal.
  Edit: "Fascism is good, actually." -liberals
  
  It's not that it's "not a big deal." It's that he's still the better of the two realistic possibilities. No Republican running for president will be harder on Israel than Biden is being (which is, admittedly, in no way hard), and they are all far worse on other metrics important to the left.
  
  I remember Democrats telling me that the strategy was to elect Biden and then "hold his feet to the fire". When did that happen?
  
  But that's another hand-waving deflection. When can we discuss the deeply problematic words and actions of our current president without establishment liberals popping out of wells to tell us he's not as bad as Republicans? He's still doing and supporting some unacceptably fucked up shit.
  
  We can do that once the threat of right wing extremism is not so imminent. We lashed out at Hillary and got Trump. Now women can't get abortions without dying first. Corporations have their record profits and record tax breaks. We don't want another four years of constant stress
  
  Lol. Do you really think that Trump became president because the Left critizized Clinton too much?
  
  It surely didn't help. At this point I don't think people can be blamed for being spooked and leery of anything that might help Trump.
  
  You raise a good point, and just as a disclaimer I'm not American, but I feel like there's space for a) voting and campaigning for the democratic candidate, while also b) decrying your poverty of choice in the matter.
  But maybe the stakes are just so existential (clearly), that any disent has to take a backseat to just getting the less shitty party in power.
  
  The right wing extremism will always be imminent. It's like a show that ends every episode on a cliffhanger to try to keep audiences watching. Hillary gave us Trump: https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/
  Then she positioned herself as the only solution. It's funny when people say "OMG HILLARY WAS RIGHT" yeah, of course she could tell the outcome of a situation she was key in creating. She wanted that presidency and she was willing to promote fascists to get there. Vote for her or die. This is basically the only democrat strategy now. I'm going to keep voting for democrats anyway because our system has no real choice, but don't use this situation to shield democrats from criticism, they deserve plenty of it.
  
  It's funny when people say "OMG HILLARY WAS RIGHT" yeah, of course she could tell the outcome of a situation she was key in creating.
  That's s stupid comment regardless of which candidate or election you're taking about. "Hillary warned us about Trump!" Of course she did. She was running against Trump! She would've warned us about her opponent regardless of who it was. In fact, if she didn't do that, she would be a shitty campaigner.
  You know who else Hillary warned us about? Bernie Sanders!
  
  I’m going to keep voting for democrats anyway because our system has no real choice
  Yeah... people are quick to point out that Republicans can't win elections without massive voter repression - but they never admit that Democrats can't win without literally threatening everyone with the other side's fascism, either.
  It's been that way ever since the Obama betrayal - and that's not something corporate liberalism will ever deserve forgiveness for.
  
  they never admit that Democrats can't win without literally threatening everyone with the other side's fascism...
  That's some absurd reasoning. "pointing out how the GOP are literally acting like fascists is the stupid Democrats fault".
  Get the fuck out of here.
  
  That’s some absurd reasoning.
  Really? Tell me again who are the ones "reaching across the aisle" as soon as the voting is done, enlightened centrist understander?
  Get the fuck out of here.
  No. I won't.
  
  So you're doubling down on blaming democrats for conservative fascism? Because you're blaming democrats for conservative fascism.
  
  So you’re doubling down on blaming democrats for conservative fascism?
  I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you simply forgot who it is that fascists actually serve.
  Want a hint? You need me to remind you which dems are proud capitalists?
  
  Democrats are not just pointing out that republicans are acting like fascists, democrats are actively funding and supporting fascists because they think of it as a valid strategy: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/20/1106256047/why-democrats-are-paying-for-ads-supporting-republican-primary-candidates
  https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries
  https://nypost.com/2022/09/12/democrats-spend-53m-to-boost-far-right-gop-candidates/
  Then they turn around and point at those candidates to say "we must defeat fascism". The problem is that some of these crazy candidates actually get elected (see trump, as I pointed out with the link I posted about clinton's team helping him). Democrats would rather slide into fascism instead of moving to the left, which is why they're funding these campaigns and then claiming they're the only way to fight it.
  
  It's been that way ever since the Obama betrayal
  It was that way during the 2004 Bush v. Kerry election and probably the 2000 Bush v. Gore election, too. (I don't remember much about 2000 because I wasn't really paying attention to politics yet.) And it probably goes back even further than that.
  You know all of the rhetoric used against Trump? They were saying all of the same things about W. Bush.
  
  This is all 100%.
  Criticizing them doesn't matter though. They're still happy and rich if they lose.
  The fight won't be small jabs, it will be big and all at once
  
  We can do that once the threat of right wing extremism is not so imminent
  Is exactly the kind of attitude that results in the kind of right wing democrats that gave the extreme right wing enough leeway to take over the GOP rather than be shunned by society like they were before the DNC and their media arm elevated Trump.
  
  You mean the threat that he has basically only delayed? That as a party, historically, the democrats have only ever delayed because their shitty centrist candidates do nothing to progress beyond; leading to an America that is on the brink of fascism?
  You should probably retire that macro… it’s getting a little musty.
  
  Eat a bag of dicks. I'm not going to shut up about genocide because you're afraid of losing an election.
  
  It's coming from a place of privilege to think we can wait until then. It's coming from a position in which you can stand back and look at everything through the lens of a campaign rather than being deeply hurt by his policies. People in the border camps need to be freed NOW. We need to give the land back NOW. Israel needs to stop committing genocide NOW.
  I'm sorry if it causes you "constant stress" to think about this. I'm sure other people's pain and suffering is so hard for you to bear, but we need to talk about this. We need to somehow stop Biden and his party from continuing to support and bolster these atrocities.
  
  Wow you assume a LOT
  
  Yep, and all based on experience with US liberals
  
  "My world view is defined by my limited personal experience" is the most right wing thing I've ever heard. If we're going around judging a person's entire life on single statements.
  
  You know what else is a right-wing thing? Completely misrepresenting someone's words. I didn't say what you quoted, nor did I allude to it.
  Thinking we're supposed to be satisfied with a right-wing neoliberal president who open supports and bolsters genocidal and colonial practices because there is worse opposition, or treating humans like pawns in some sick tactical election game while people suffer under Biden's leadership-- these are objectively damaging and privileged positions to take.
  If your response to someone criticizing the president for his genocidal practices is to become defensive and say "tEh RePuBlIcAnS aRe WoRsE!!!1!!" then you've got a fucking problem.
  Edit: Besides, the Democrats are a right-wing party
  
  You are badly confused in your vision of what's possible.
  
  OK. I'll be that vs. someone who excuses atrocoties like fascism and genocide. I'll be that vs. someone who clothes their speech in tolerance while building camps and walls at the border.
  That's still much better than what you are.
  
  And voting for Trump or DeSantis or Halley is going to do what, exactly, to help?
  
  Here's another thing you do that really pushes people away: No one said a damn thing about voting Trump, or DeSantis, or anyone else.
  In fact, I don't think I even mentioned voting at all.
  Who's president right now? Let's talk about him. We need to be able to demand he cease his genocidal actions without having people like you constantly deflecting criticism with this pointless whataboutism. It's as pointless as it is exhausting.
  
  Lol, Biden himself has admired that there are 50 other democrats that could also beat trump.
  So try again there, bub.
  
  At least 40 of which would probably be more likely to than himself.
  
  Yup.
  
  Liberals: "Jeez this genocide is detestable for what it's doing to Biden's polling."
  
  It's all a sick game to them. It's always about the polls and the next election. Sometimes I feel like they're incapable of any actual genuine empathy.
  
  It’s always about the polls and the next election.
  Isn't that what democracy is supposed to do? The elected leader should follow the will of the people. If the people are saying do X, the leader should do X despite his personal preference.
  
  I'm referring to people who shield the current president from criticism of his genocidal practices by arguing that if we talk about these deeply disturbing things he's supporting and doing, it will somehow hurt his chances in the next election. Literally no consideration or empathy for the people being harmed by his actions -- just "well, he needs to win the next election." Extremely deranged.
  If the people are saying do X, the leader should do X despite his personal preference
  No. If the people are calling for genocidal or colonial practices, then no. You are using the same logic people would use to defend the anti-trans and anti-POC laws my own state has passed. The majority here may support them, but this does not mean they are immune to criticism, nor should they be. It's really anti-human and anti-progress to think otherwise.
  Edit: I want people to really read this user's comments to me right here. This right here is the brainrot that privileged liberals bring to the table. Absolutely appalling behavior by this person.
  Also, imagine thinking the only choices are tyranny of the majority or authoritarianism. Brain. Rot.
  
  Shielding biden
  Yeah, no ones doing that. Maybe some fringe morons but liberals don't worship their elected leaders
  
  This doesn't seem correct. Any criticism of a Democrat immediately elicits defensiveness and wild accusations of supporting Trump. I'm starting to think they're incapable of actual empathy. Imagine defending something like ICE or Israel.
  
  Got a link? I'd love to call that Democrat a dumbass
  
  Please do: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6053774
  
  If the people are calling for genocidal or colonial practices, then no.
  A just dictator is the best government. But that's not democracy. Many people are bad. We can only hope that a majority are good.
  
  While you talk about from a distance in terms of political theory, we have people suffering under Biden's leadership. It's people like you who enable these atrocities. It's all a sick game to you...
  
  It’s people like you who enable these atrocities
  You have confused me with the majority of people. If the vast majority said do X, a leader in a democracy does X or will be voted out with someone who will do it.
  Trump has promised to do worse to Muslims and Palestinians. A large percentage of the American population agrees with Trump and will therefore vote for him.
  
  I think a lot of people are just frustrated by the religious extremism which drives the conflict.
- Yet the guy who says this shit is the liberal choice for president: "Folks, were there no Israel, there wouldn't be a Jew in the world that was safe."
  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-alludes-disagreements-with-israels-netanyahu-2023-12-12/
  
  That comes with the boldest admission I’ve ever seen, that we as the entire rest of the world are uniformly unwilling to stand by and protect the Jewish people in our communities and countries. Fuck that. No, we must protect our Jewish neighbors, we must be willing to take in Jewish refugees of antisemitism. We must take it upon ourselves be the place where Jews are safe. Saying Israel is the source of Jewish safety is a fucking cop out and it’s a disgusting one at that.
  
  But if past performance is any indication, it’s also true.
  
  There are lots of marginalized groups that do not have the benefit of having a homeland country that are continuing to survive. Maybe we were more barbaric in the past, and there's certainly still antisemitism to root out, but I don't agree with the take that countries couldn't protect their own Jewish populations.
  
  There are no other groups that had 2/3rds of their population in Europe and almost half their worldwide population systemically murdered, while the world refused ships full of Jews and had hard quotas on how many Jews were allowed in.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St._Louis
  Should these countries protect their population? Yes. Did they? Maybe their own. But they sure didn’t protect Jews in the rest of Europe. Did the US have a duty to protect German citizens? Do we today? What has actually changed?
  
  What total horse shit. Mark Zuckerberg's safety is in no way conditioned on the existence of Israel.
  But Biden isn't a liberal (in conventional US usage anyway) and I doubt he'd describe himself as one. He's an establishment centrist if there ever was one.
  
  He's a neoliberal Clintonite. He's in the most right wing part of even that right wing form of liberalism, but still a neoliberal, which is the DNC default kind of liberalism and has been since 1992.
- this is another meme using the European/PolSci definition of Liberals, meaning classic/neoliberal, as in 'capitalists'. Definitely confusing and generally wrong in a modern US context.
- In most sane countries Liberals include the US Republican party
  
  Source: My rectum
  
  Your rectum seems to have a grasp of what liberalism means, which makes sense since it sees shit all the time

167 评论