You're viewing a single thread.
Second amendment means we should have anti-aircraft missiles too. This is not a joke. I am serious.
Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It'd just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.
The answer is UBI: Universal Ballistic Income
Isn't that just a fancy term for shooting rolls of coins at people with a slingshot?
No, it's a fancy term for "I want to create hyperinflation because no one has the balls to either raise taxes to cover it or cut military spending to afford it."
Afraid of the increasing missile street violence? Call now and buy your own handheld missile launcher today at 50% discount. The best way to stop a bad guy with a missile launcher is a good guy with a missile launcher.
bosnian ape society was really ahead of their time
This is what organized militias are for. Crowdfunding and rigourous oversight
The free market is very good at reducing prices. Do you really think the price the government pays for missiles is reasonable?
Anti-aircraft missiles, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear SAMs, shall not be infringed.
Play it again, SAM.
Shadow wizard money gang (we love casting spells) LEGALISE NUCLEAR BOMBS
When are you announcing your presidential run?