This year really is just gonna be us swinging from election to election, I suppose. I feel Lenin's beaming red eyes on me.
Up next on our electoral tour is Portugal. The current government - a coalition of the center-left Socialists and the center-right Social Democrats - has been mired in corruption scandals, resulting in a general election being called a mere two years after the last one. The fascist and vaguely populist Chega party has gained significant support over the last two years due to the economic hardships. Yesterday, the Social Democrats secured a narrow win of 79 seats compared to the Socialists' 77. Chega, in third place at 48, would appear to be the best candidate for a coalition, though the leader of the Social Democrats has said that they would refuse a coalition with them due to their xenophobic views. Regardless, the fascist surge is worrying, if expected.
Portugal's economy is going pretty badly even as European countries go, with little growth in productivity or investment over the last decade. The origins of this crisis date back to Portugal making the euro their national currency in the early 2000s, thus surrendering their ability to control their own currency, becoming reliant on investment from Germany and France, and suffering greatly in the 2012 European debt crisis. Unemployment and low wages spurred emigration; in 2013, the youth employment rate was about 40%; this has only come down to 25% recently and is increasing again. The government is heavily reliant on debt for public spending, with a debt-to-GDP ratio skyrocketing to over 100% in the two decades since the turn of the millennium. The capitalist sector is simply not profitable enough and hasn't been for 40 years, which is only a problem if you are a capitalist economy. For more on the Portuguese economy, check out Michael Roberts' recent analysis, from which I obtained a lot of this information.
Inside Portugal is the same story playing out across much of Europe. A failing center or center-left political party, unable to cope with the economic troubles of the last few years due to absolute obedience to neoliberal policies. A fascist party rising, but with no alternative economic plan, hoping that perhaps oppressing minorities and going after "wokeism" will make their God, The Economy, rain blessings down on them again.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Portugal! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Basically Aus wanted new submarines and had a deal with France, which they then scuttled in favour of buying subs from the US. They were supposed to get subs starting in the 2030s. Recently, the US announced that their sub building capacity is not sufficient and so they scaled back sub building expectations. That fucks Australia because they can't buy subs that don't exist.
Except they can and will buy subs that don't exist because the America military industrial complex is designed to be parasitic, not protective.
This failure of industrial capacity in favour of financial parasitism has harmed project ukraine already. The same phenomenon will be even more of a disaster if any future US regime decides to go to war against China.
Some choice quotes:
The former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia has been “mugged by reality” over the Aukus submarine deal after the US announced it will halve the number of submarines it will build next year, throwing the Australia end of the agreement into doubt.
With the US president, Joe Biden, continuing to face a hostile Congress, the Pentagon budget draft request includes construction of just one Virginia-class nuclear submarine for 2025.
Greens senator David Shoebridge, who has been critical of the Aukus deal from the start, said the US budget announcement was the beginning of the end of Aukus.
“When the US passed the law to set up Aukus, they put in kill switches, one of which allowed the US to not transfer the submarines if doing so would ‘degrade the US undersea capabilities’. Budgeting for one submarine all but guarantees this,” he said on X.
The ALP grassroots activist group, Labor Against War, want the Albanese government to freeze Aukus payments to the US so as not to “underwrite the US navy industrial shipyards”.
The national convenor of Labor Against War, Marcus Strom, said Australian taxpayers should not be footing the bill for America’s dockyards.
“We are on the hook to the tune of $3bn as soon as next year as a downpayment for subs that might never arrive and be useless on delivery,” he said.
lol I always knew they would bitterly regret this, the best part is the french subs they were going to buy are better than the us subs they will never get. Beyond parody.
The French subs might have been better if they were delivered on time but they were already far behind schedule and major parts of the deal like having them constructed locally were being actively undermined by the French.
So this might need its own effort post actually because it touches on a few interesting points related to french nuclear industries and policies. The very short version of the story is that the US has spent the last 30 years trying to fuck up the french nuclear industry and steal its tech, using a plethora of methods, more recently essentially kidnapping an AREVA executive on fraudulent charges to force a sale on a critical french nuclear company (they made boilers for reactors, very complex take). Naturally france didnt do shit since the days of DeGaulle and backstabbing anglos are gone, its reluctantly subservient to anglo interests now. Anyway this long rambling paragraph to basically say that the subs werent built in aus because the french forces had intel suggesting that the us would literally just steal the designs and then torpedo the deal anyway. This last part I know from relatives with very high ranking posts (like, 4 star admiral level, and yeah theyre pigs) in the french navy casually mentioning this at family gatherings. This is disorganized and incoherent, i might do an effort post to structure this nicely down the line
The subs Aus was going to get were diesel electric versions. That was part of the problem. Australia didn't want to order existing plan subs because they have no way to refuel nuclear subs. So they spent years redesigning them and they still hadn't finalized the plans by the time construction was supposed to have started.
Oh shit i completely forgot they got redesigned the whole thing, yeah what a fuckin nightmare. I mean at this point they shouldve just… made their own design lol?
I'd be curious to ride around in one, but it would be unpleasant (tall). That said, no reason we have to subsidise the US's military ship building capacity. Obviously, we (as in the state apparatus in "Australia") will unless something changes severely.
I remember when this was first going down, I watched an ex-Prime minister (I think) talking about how horrendous a deal it was even when they were getting all the subs. They were too big for Australia's shallow coast, too expensive per sub, and the whole deal was built on jingoism against China. So funny watching the deal blow up in their faces
Love the "The US will absolutely wint he war against China" when our military is already taxed to near breaking just by logistics and maintenance during nominal peacetime and our weapons systems are getting more complicated and expensive every year. "AMERICA HAS ELEVEN CARRIERS CHINA HAS 22222222222222222" Like cool, bro, but how many of htose Carriers can actually be sent to see with a combat load for near peer battles they've never been tested in? And how many can we afford to lose before the Empire becomes combat ineffective? And how long can they be supplied with spares and ammo and fuel by our aging, disintegrating fleet?