The prohibition was one of many side issues included in the mammoth $1.2 trillion package to fund the government through September.
Key part of article:
The White House said that while it had not been able to block the flag proposal, it was "successful in defeating 50+ other policy riders attacking the LGBTQI+ community that Congressional Republicans attempted to insert into the legislation."
They are going out of their way to attack queer people any way they can and if they really get the power they need to achieve it, there will be a genocide. Or at least a genocide far more noticeable than the current one going on, mostly directed at trans people.
Government property shouldn't be for individual ideologies or agendas.
If you have a problem with this, then you should also be cool with "don't tread on me" or "straight pride" flags being flown in government buildings. Otherwise, you're just a hypocrite.
Flying flags of acceptance are not the same as flying flags of non-acceptance. It's like saying hanging a flag that says all are welcome is the same as one that says Whites Only Fountain.
There is no agenda in a prode flag, there is one in a don't tread on me flag. As for a straight pride flag I'd never heard of one till now. They sound like very petty, whiny, privelaged people.