Asked whether Canada would increase spending in the forthcoming April 16 federal budget, Freeland declined to give an answer either way.
Gee, I sure hope we do. I don't really want to be dependent on the US any more than we have to in this increasingly dangerous world. We actually cut funding the last time around. Her dodging the question doesn't inspire confidence although I guess it's pretty secret what's going to be in there.
As a canadian id be happy if we met the 2% gdp target, as an engineer i see it as public spending to help boost our high tech industries and prevent skilled workers from packing up and leaving.
But the government needs to carve out an agreement as a part of NORAD where canadian companies can sell defence products to the US without being american owned and 51% american operated.. otherwise were just paying money to lose industries and the biggest purchases most of our governments will ever make just go to building industries and jobs in other countries. Imo thats why we currently dont hit the spending target, wheres the economic benefit in an age of economic problems?
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland says Canada's commitment to Ukraine has been an important contribution to NATO's strength at a time when the United States has been "unable to step up" on aid to the embattled country.
Freeland was responding to a question about Canada's efforts to meet NATO's military spending target for member nations — two per cent of GDP — in an interview airing Saturday on CBC's The House.
She told host Catherine Cullen that Canada's per capita commitments to Ukraine — which she called "NATO's most pressing challenge" — had been very significant.
"Canadians can stand up tall and proud, knowing that our country is absolutely doing our part to resist Russia [and] support Ukraine, which is NATO's biggest fight," she said.
Freeland said "shenanigans in Congress" have left the U.S. unable to provide much-needed support to Ukraine as it fights to defend itself from Russian forces.
And I've been equally clear that I don't think it's fair to assess Canada's performance or commitment to defence by reference to any single metric," he said.
The original article contains 644 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Her grandfather was a Nazi. She can't escape that and refuses to address the reality of it so she comes out with headlines like this. It has zero possibility of becoming reality in an effort to create a different narrative around her eventual run at the p.m. Spot.
She's very quickly becoming someone not worth listening to in Canada.
On that note, I guess I don't understand why a Nazi grandfather has any meaning whatsoever. I think her response to someone pointing that out should be "Yup, can't pick our relatives," shrug, and move on.
Being descended from a villain or hero doesn't tell us enough about a person to have any meaning.
Having a sordid family history certainly isn't disqualifying. Not being honest and transparent about it raises more Red flags than I'm willing to accept from someone angling to run a country.
I disagree but because I have German ancestry there's probably a nazi somewhere in my family tree so it's not worth listening to anything I say. That's good because otherwise you might hear me call you a racist asshole.
If you look at anyone with recent German ancestry, you'll find nazis. One of my great grandfathers was a nazi. Is that some kind indictment against me? Does it outweigh the other three ancestors that fought against fascism? I don't understand why people make such a big deal out of this.
Only an indictment against you if you lie about it and cover for your family's past. Everyone's got a history of course, it's about how you acknowledge that and live your life. Her behaviour on this is shameful, therein lies the problem.
One was a farmer, the other an electrician. The ladies were home makers . All served for the allied forces in the war. Certainly not Saints, certainly not Nazis or sympathizers.