Hi there, while your post is technically on-topic, it would be more appropriate to post it in a community like !unixporn@lemmy.ml - that way we're not flooded with screenshots. :)
I'll leave this post up for now, unless we get many complaints.
Yes, I'd like to file an official complaint. What's the P.O.Box number to post it too ? :-) On a more serious note, for OP @GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee and others, Garuda Linux turns out to have their own Lemmy instance : https://lemmy.garudalinux.org and well as a community here : https://lemmy.ml/c/garudalinux Have fun!
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !garudalinux@lemmy.ml
That's really cool! Didn't know that. Thanks for sharing, since I've just subscribed to the community.
I used Garuda in the past and was impressed. What's cool is they have a bunch of ther own services in addition to Lemmy.
Garuda Linux | Startpage - https://start.garudalinux.org/
Sorry about that. I'll keep that in mind if this gets taken down. Thanks!
Garuda is great. It did get me addicted to the fish shell though and I've since moved back to windows for work reasons and I hate everything now.
Install fish shell on all the things!
Fish shell FTW! :) https://fishshell.com/
Honestly, fish is the only thing I hate about Garuda. The variety of commands is good, but doing any kinda scripting in it physically hurts me. Wish they kinda just stuck with a more conventional shell like zsh.
Possibly a n00b question. What’s the benefit of fish over zsh or bash? Does it provide something extra?
I’m using zsh at the moment.
Last time I checked it's like zsh but preconfigured and dumbed down. Like the zsh4humans repo, but worse.
New? Does it come with 2080 packages out of the box?
My thoughts exactly, Garuda looks out of the box like a install i'm done with and have to redo.
But to each their own, i'm not judging, i was young not too long ago.
There is a plain kde version that doesn't have all the gamer color flare, forums won't support you tho, which isn't a problem if you know what you're doing
They likely have chosen a lot of programs on the installer. I have had my current install for a few years and I'm sitting at 2029 packages
I did select a number of programs to install during setup so I had everything I needed. Spot on!
Garuda has multiple ISOs, ranging from almost bare to batteries + power plant included. This appears to be the most heavy one, which is great to get to know cool software, but also an Arch veterans nightmare.
High resolution neofetch image? 👀
If that's not a distro specific thing,
then please teach me how 😄I'm not sure what Gaduda is using, but neofetch supports various logo backends (with ASCII being the default). To get a high-resolution image, you might want to use one of the sixel/tycat/w3m/kitty backends (depending on what image protocol your terminal supports).
I think they have a version of neofetch on the chaotic aur repository that they use
Oh I see, thank you!
Will definitely play around with that tomorrow :)
Ikr! It’s so good that I’m thinking of trying geruda. Maybe just for the logo alone lmao
What's the difference between Garuda, endeavour OS and Manjaro? Genuine question
EndeavourOS is a terminal-centic distro (it isn't trying to be very user friendly but just easy to install and with some very important stuff included). Garuda has some modern performance improvements (preload, Zen kernel etc) and generally a lot of stuff preinstalled. Manjaro tries to be a general good easy to use desktop distro without Garuda's optimization stuff but it's quite bad at it because of poor management of the project
Garuda goes for the looks and the gamers I would say. I've tried Garuda before and it was nice that it was possible to roll-back installation versions but on my ancient test hardware it didn't go too well, also not with rolling back. Manjaro got quite some bad press in the past for good reasons. Here you can compare a few descriptions for all of them :
- https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=garuda
- https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=endeavour
- https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=manjaro
One notable difference between the three is that Manjaro has a delayed package release. It is not as rolling as the others.
Thank you so much
Endeavour is Arch with an easy to use graphical installer and a few changed defaults. IMHO it should be merged into Arch itself as an installer option, but I guess making it too easy to install is against the project philosophy... It's basically Arch aside from those details.
Manjaro uses the Arch packages so it's also rolling (not sure what the other comment means saying it's not) but curates everything heavily. It has a "stable" package branch which doesn't exist on Arch, where packages enter after testing and a two week delay on average (probably where the rolling confusion originates from; it's still rolling, just later).
It comes with a LTS kernel by default and all kinds of other safety and helpers. It has its own package manager with a GUI, a driver detection and installer, a kernel version manager, automatic OS snapshots after every upgrade so you can restore if something breaks etc. (I've never had to use the restore but it's nice knowing it's there I guess.)
It's quite stable and nice (I've been using it as my main desktop driver for work and gaming for the last 4 years) but you have to stick to its recommended features for it to remain stable. There are people who switch to the non-stable branches, or use non-LTS kernels or do other changes and it breaks and they end up upset.
There are all kinds of rumors circulating about it because of that, saying you can't use AUR packages on it (you can) or that it's buggy, "badly managed" etc. From my own experience it's a perfectly nice distro provided you want to get the distro out of the way and focus on doing other things, but still take advantage of rolling packages. If you want to experiment and tinker with the OS you're better off on Arch or installing through Endeavour.
Garuda is somewhere in the middle, has an installer and nice defaults like Endeavour, has helper GUIs like Manjaro and uses Manjaro's GUI package manager, but doesn't take things as far as Manjaro (with the stable branch and kernel and curation etc.) Also has a gamer-oriented thing going with a cool desktop theme and a gaming package manager GUI.
I had problems with Manjaro, would not recommend it, and now use EndeavourOS.
That said, you did a fantastic write-up here. Really well done.
I don’t need EOS and Arch to merge. I would be happy if Arch would just include yay or paru in the main repos so you could use the AUR out of the box.
The problems with Manjaro are not just people using non-stable branches or even project governance ( though that had unfortunate moments ). The biggest issues I had were the disagreements that Manjaro had with the AUR due to missing or outdated packages. As you point out, these packages are merely delayed. However, the decisions made about system state today can carry forward into the future and are not always unwound once the core packages finally update. I had issues with pamac as well where it would install old packages instead of new ones unless I cleared the cache all the time. Maybe that was somehow my fault. I use plain old yay and paru now with the occasional pacseek for good measure.
Manjaro is still a good looking OS though. I think most people prefer the green to the purple in EOS. Lots of people love the look of Garuda but, for me, it is too much.
Again, really nice write-up. I hope Manjaro continues to serve you well.
Nothing like choosing the "everything" ISO and having 2k+ Packages on a fresh install lol
I mean, I like Garuda, but I opted for replicating the look and feel on Endeavour xD
I've been on Endeavor for close to 2 years now. It's been great.
I'm a huge fan of Garuda. Enjoy!
Please share more as you keep using it.
Smells like dark cherries
at first I loved garuda then I realized how bloated it is
