True. It's a great litmus test but it's still extremely painful to hear from people who are well meaning but stubborn since media outlets in the west only say CCP.
It's one of those red scare hurdles that is everywhere, especially in the US of A.
I understand. It irks me too as it reminds me of the disastrous pivoting to Asia that I feel is part of the current trend towards a more unstable world.
On another level, it annoys the hell out of me just as a matter of trying to be polite to someone by referring to them by how they call themselves.
Nah, correcting them is a good talking point and it doesn't erode their identifiability because they won't accept the correction. CNN, Washington Post, NYT, NPR, etc all say CCP so as far as they're concerned God himself bestowed the name CCP on them and nothing could possibly change their minds. But it can still catch unsuspecting default-libs who look into it and go "hang on, why does every single Western source literally just use an incorrect name for a foreign political party?"
I'd say if they were never going to use the correct acronym in the first place, then I just wouldn't say anything to them unless they get confused and ask why I use CPC.
Frankly I think CCP for some of them is a way for them to make believe they are fighting the Soviets again.
Don't, it's a simple shibboleth and not worth the effort. Pulling people up on it makes them more reflexively suspicious of you. People using it means they're probably a lib.
Still pretty useful as a Shibboleth. But both points suggest we only let the cool people know it should be CPC, no use chasing libs around on semantics.
随着1943年共产国际的解散,中国官方以CPC取代CCP,亦在情理之中。很明显,“the Communist Party of China (CPC)”里的“of China”强调的是,这个党是属于中国的政党,是为中国奋斗的政党,主要体现了这个党的独立性。
Following the dissolution of Comintern in 1943, it was reasonable that the Chinese government replaced CCP with CPC. Obviously, the “China” in the “Communist Party of China” emphasizes the national character of the party, that it represents a party that fights for China (the country), and to underline the independence of the party (from its previous association with Comintern).
CPPCC = Chinese People’s Political Consultative Committee lol
This is interesting if that's the explanation because I'm reading a textbook about China's history from the Qing empire to current day and the introduction used CPC, while the rest of the book so far (up to the 1930s) has used CCP. I wondered what was up.
Chinese China of China vs. Chinese China China. The former is the correct one.
Jokes aside CPC is a dog whistle for cool people and CCP is a sign that someone is a big ol' lib. I don't correct people because the big ol' libs don't need to learn this, they should get radicalized first.
However, CPC is the official translation, and CCP unnecessarily centers "Chinese", insinuating xenophobia. CCP is probably a self-translation from anti-communist chinese expats who might have limited english fluency and didn't use many english sources of information. People saying it's supposed to Evoke the CCCP I think are off the mark.
IMO, I think CCP can be rejected as an incorrect translation, because the word used in the original is Zhōngguó, not Zhōnghuá.
Now, the word used in the named PRC is Zhōnghuá, so the most accurate translation of that would be Chinese People's Republic? now that's cursed. I bet that's the official translation in some language, but none I know.
i argued with a lib about this and how westerners did the same thing during vietnam with VCP instead of CPV to racistly emphasize the nationality.. didn't go anywhere they just called me a crazy reaching tankie and said chinese communist party "rolls off the tongue better"
Thoughts? Is it worthwhile to correct people on this?
It's worthwhile correcting people on it purely because CCP and CPC indicate who is a reasonable human who will talk about the country honestly and take on new information compared to who is currently completely consumed by propaganda.
I correct people on it and if they continue to say CCP I switch to berating them and making the interaction as miserable as possible. If they switch to CPC I know I'm talking to a person that will take on new information I give them.
i tend to take the tack that it's not particularly fruitful to argue about semantics of a foreign name unless you're going to be there or interfacing directly. does the party actually care how nobody yankees refer to them? would you care what order an abbreviation of your org was in cyrillic?
I think since it's so low effort to switch between them that it acts as a good way to see if someone is willing to change their perspective or are stubborn. This is the least material thing though it's just annoying to hear sometimes because chuds over enunciate the first two Cs.
chuds would over enunciate and use CPC like a slur if it became the common parlance, that's just a matter of tone.
i can see both sides of the non chud equation though and i don't think either are worthwhile. yes if someone switches terminology for you it means they're flexible and respectful. but many people, even fellow travellers and comrades can take semantic corrections in a hostile way. focusing on spelling, grammar, naming conventions etc can be seen as ignoring or sidestepping what someone is actually trying to say.
I work in coffee and frequently have to deal with names that the (very) white people around me can't pronounce and unless they ask, I don't correct them, I just say it correctly myself.
I’ve heard/read that it’s (ccp) technically correct in Chinese and that CPC was adopted to fit communist party naming conventions in the 20th century. I could be full of shit though + I haven’t read any comments here
I think it's only useful as an example (preferably one among many) of how many English-language sources are uninterested in getting even minor details about China right, and/or are showing their bias by their willingness to intentionally take petty cheap shots.
Best quick hit I can think of is:
It's like running across a foreign language source that calls the Democratic Party the Democrat Party. Either they aren't that familiar with the facts or they're cribbing right-wing crank shit.