A man who was accused of sexually and physically assaulting a woman had his charges dropped in April, just weeks before he was set to stand trial in Toronto, due to a lack of judges in the region.
A man who was accused of sexually and physically assaulting a woman had his charges dropped in April, just weeks before he was set to stand trial in Toronto, due to a lack of judges in the region.
I'm not advocating for violence, but hypothetically, if a group of people decided to intact their own form of justice on this guy, would the courts also drop their case "due to lack of judges"? Because that's an interesting loophole.
Risky strategy because it is probably either a luck of the draw scenario or the prosecutor (is that how they're called in Canada?) deciding which cases have the lowest chance of winning on trial.
If Canada is anything like the US, most criminal cases never make it to trial and the judge is only involved to approve a plea deal. If every criminal case went to trial it would overwhelm the courts.
We should use AI to just cases in these scenarios.
I mean FFS, our local police issued an advisory listing the following:
"prior criminal convictions for Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault with a Weapon, Assault with a Weapon, Assault, Robbery, Possession of Explosives, Uttering Threats, and Failing to Comply with Probation Orders."
Someone like that in this situation should default to being locked up until a judge is available. It's not like the judge would say "you're free to go" anyway, so who gives a damn about keeping him in jail?
It should always be about protecting victims (past and future), as well as showing the community that they are being kept safe. The justice system failed on all counts!