That's literally the same argument that's been made for every tech advancement in history.
I'm happy to entertain specific problems with THIS tech, but keeping people doing a job that doesn't actually require a human is no different than having people dig a ditch and then fill it back in repeatedly.
Proper journalists are massively different than ditch diggers.
One cannot have a closed loop of AI as a newspaper. At least, not for another 50 years until the language models acquire enough subtly. Even then, I ain’t gonna read that shit. I want a human take on human problems.