A cool guide to Epicurean Paradox
A cool guide to Epicurean Paradox
You're viewing part of a thread.
You asserted that there was no God.
You're unable to prove your claim.
Now you're resorting to an ad hominem attack.
You have a right to say you don't believe in God, but no way to prove it.
And here's a list of ad hominem attacks, so you can improve your logic.
Six hours later: resorts to ad hominem attacks when he can't defend his argument. The hypocrisy is off the scales!
Are you following all my posts now?
Maybe you should go outside and touch the grass instead.
Fabrication, exaggeration, and deflection, all in two sentences. Impressive but it seems you have a lot of practice.
You really amuse me.
You can tell because if you annoyed me, I'd have blocked you.
But I find you hilarious.
Please keep on venting your scorn and derision.
Scorn? Derision? Lol.
I like to hear myself talk. Look how I explain myself like a Bond villain.
Now I'm going to make some more things up in response to a comment about how I make things up. Behold my lack of self awareness! Quail before my hypocrisy!
I'm blocking you because you're a predictable, boring hypocrite, one of those people whose point is "whatever makes me 'win', even if I contradict myself elsewhere to 'win' again". Feel free to have the last word for others but I won't see it.
Really?
You haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about.
There is no evidence of anything like this "god" proposition.
You assert a proposition then THE ONUS IS ON YOU FOR PROOF.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I NEVER CLAIMED THERE IS NO GOD. I CLEARLY STATED THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY SUCH THING.
What ad hominem?
You're full of shit.
A lot of capital letters and some dirty words. I'll let your own reply speak for itself.
Good day.
Yeah, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about or even have a grasp on the core concepts involved.
Good day indeed.