Chinese #MeToo journalist jailed for five years
Chinese #MeToo journalist jailed for five years
Sophia Huang Xueqin had been one of the main #MeToo voices in China when she was arrested in 2021.
A prominent female #MeToo activist in China has been handed a five-year jail sentence for "subversion against the state".
Sophia Huang Xueqin was convicted and sentenced on Friday, nearly 10 months after she went on trial.
Labour activist Wang Jianbing, who stood trial with Ms Huang, was sentenced to three years and six months in prison.
Ms Huang, 36, had been one of the most prominent voices in China's #MeToo space, reporting ground-breaking stories about sexual abuse victims.
She had also spoken out about the misogyny and sexism she faced in Chinese newsrooms.
Chinese authorities have not made it clear how the two stood accused of subversion. The trial was a closed-door hearing.
But their supporters say they were detained because they hosted regular meetings and forums for young people to discuss social issues.
Example #5,457 of authoritarian countries choosing to sweep their problems under the rug rather than having to admit to any shortcomings. Reminds me of the Chernobyl miniseries
Yeah Russia bad 😞
The beatings will continue until morale improves!!
Time to start disassembling the beaters.
Hexbears are salivating.
Why put her in prison when she works harder than the average ccp member
because she works harder than the average ccp member.
Because she works harder than the average ccp member ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Another way to read this headline: Chinese MeToo activist jailed "for 5 years".
She'll be in there for 5 years, and suddenly she disappears after nobody has been thinking of her for 5 years, and theres no press about it. Then she could be held in private jail forever.
Shocker.
I still miss Naomi Wu’s tech videos.
Ironically, if she had used a Chinese hashtag she would've been fine. The state's case hinges on #MeToo being a US-backed movement, just like #Pride.
LGBT and women's rights activists in China are restricted from using foreign iconography and foreign slogans, but not from demonstrating. It's absurd, but altogether a different issue than what the article makes it out to be.