Spez talks to NY Times
As the social media site matures, its users and moderators have made their displeasure about corporate changes known, putting the company into a bind.
You're viewing a single thread.
Is NYT paid to totally distort the truth like they did in that article?
The day after moderators closed down hundreds of Reddit forums...
Hundreds? I mean, I guess that's true, if you say 88 hundreds... Almost 90 hundreds.
I'm not even to the interview, and I'm already having trouble swallowing this article.
Edit: I guess "Spez talks to NY Times" was hyperbole... There's no interview, lol
"Spez gets fellated by the NY Times"
NYT: manufacturing consent since before you were born, and after you die
While New York times is far better than the New York Post. And the Washington Post is far better than Washington times. They are all for profit ventures owned by thieving wealthy capitalists. They've always pushed their own perception and agenda. Whether or not we ever realized it. And that agenda has never been about sustainability, fairness, or accuracy. It's always been this way to one extent or another. It's just that the consolidation of ownership etc as made the market much less competitive and accountable.
Explicitly? No.
Are they giving Spez softball questions and failing to challenge answers because otherwise he'd stop talking to them? Yeah, absolutely.
