Yes/No Statement
A YES vote on this measure means: Involuntary servitude would not be allowed as punishment for crime. State prisons would not be allowed to discipline people in prison who refuse to work.
A NO vote on this measure means: Involuntary servitude would continue to be allowed as punishment for crime.
Although I can't seem to find if this text is on the ballot to explain it
Just make a blame tier list at this point. I want to see where you put Harris and Biden on it
Sorry I didn't really read your story
You should ask the pond to be less scummier
Also I'm not American, and if I was you don't know who I would have voted for
You poor dumb bastard
Cringe. There's no other word for it. This makes me cringe. It's cringe worthy.
You'll jump through any hoop to say the voters should have drank more piss instead of saying the piss should have cleaned itself up
I don't just mean Gaza, I mean democratic candidates need to find a way to excite rural voters by giving them an actual path to financial stability
Your parable doesn't even make sense, the election wasn't lost by educated people refusing to drink piss, it was won by republicans by getting uneducated voters to happily eat shit thinking it'll give them super powers. (I mean educated on the issues like "what is a tarrif")
Did she call for the USA to stop sending arms to Israel or at minimum set some red lines
I play old school maplestory on maplelegends. They have strict "no real world trade" rules and no pay to win. It really is just the game how it should be played, which really highlights all the flaws in the game (there are many)
Obviously the main draw is nostalgia, so if it's something you've never played it won't have much value, but the community is great and it's an mmo with lots to do and endgame content to aspire to
People who damage culturally significant, irreplaceable things [...] deserve this kind of punishment or worse
Removed unnecessary caveat
Boy you're going to hate to find out what oil companies are doing
Again, why not assume people saying we should have been off fossil fuels a decade ago mean that we should have been researching and investing in alternatives 50 years ago? If we did, we would have a way better chance if being off fossil fuels a decade ago
Nice dude you owned those activists
You don't think maybe we would be closer to having that means of energy production now if we started 50 years ago when we noticed the impacts of climate change?
Youre assuming climate activists have the MORONIC idea of just transitioning to shit tech, instead of the idea of investing in making tech that can replace oil usage
"No art on a dead planet" is a braindead justification and does not in any way outline how vandalism of art is supposed to translate into climate activism
If damaged art hurts your feelings get mad at the government killing all art on the planet and not the activists partially damaging some art.
"I understand that we're pissing people off but there's no other way to get attention" ... not particularly compelling rebuttals in the critics section
Why not? How else should they be getting attention?
"JSO was central in setting the 2024 Labour agenda" is utterly deluded,
I won't disagree
This really reinforces my view that JSO are terribly naive and have no real idea on how their actions will seriously lead to mass change of opinions on climate change.
Yeah I don't get the vibe from you that you'd change your view
Partially related but do you have any evidence that jso tactics has a "greater backlash from the exact kind of educated people most likely to get involved in climate activism" or is that kinda vibes based
Also the section "jso critics" and "does it work"
YouTube provides transcripts. It's in the discription on the website
Kinda dumb of you to assume the only option to stop oil is an immediate cessation of all usage