Pregnancy.

I don't have the traditional anatomy so, uh, it'll probably hurt a lot during childbirth.

I seem to remember reading somewhere that they usually put computer fans in them, but I don't know if that's true.

Aww, that's a shame. Didn't really post much myself, but it was nice to see what other people were posting. I'd rather not see this place closed down. ;_;

I'd offer to help out myself, but I'm currently facing some personal stuff myself and could probably do with a break from social media.

Thanks for running the community and best of luck with wherever life is taking you.

His little tail wag is adorable.

Oh my god. You're wearing a suit that, I assume, absorbs moisture like a sponge.

Why would you lean against the space between two urinals?

Okay, those two are really cute. <3

Okay, I'm re-reading everything and I think I'm misunderstanding things (which is probably a problem on my end; my reading comprehension is terrible). Just for the sake of examples, what would the following be tagged?:

• A character that appears otherwise male, but has a visible vagina.
• And conversely, a character that has a feminine body style, but with a penis.
• A character that has a feminine body structure and genitals, is holding a trans flag and the description talks about them recently having transitioned to female.
• A character with breasts and a penis, and whose overall body type besides that is somewhere between masculine and feminine.
• A character with no defining sexual characteristics, and who is referred to as "it" in the description.

Hello! I'm the one who made the original thread, thanks for thinking about this. I'm also a cis male, and don't know much about trans and intersex people, so consider anything I say with a grain of salt.

My original proposal was basically lifted from e621's tagging rules, just as a way to start conversation: https://e621.net/wiki_pages/3294 I'd personally be fine with "I" for characters that have a "non-traditional" arrangement of genitals (including none), and it probably is easier to explain than andro/gynomorph.

I'm not too sure about the terminology myself, but my understanding is that (at least as far as e621 are concerned) andro and gynomorph refer explicitly to physical characteristics rather than gender identity. Specifically, gynomorph refers to a feminine body with a penis, and andromorph refers to a masculine body with a vagina. I think the actual gender of the characters aren't involved in the definitions.

Of course, I've been known to be wrong before, and this is an area I don't feel anywhere near qualified to speak with authority. I'd be interested to hear the thoughts of people more involved in this sort of thing.

[F*] for a character that looks male (or intersex) but identifies as female would be fine by me. Although that has opened up a question as to whether we use "tag what we see" or whether a character's identity is important.

And thanks for not entertaining the terms "dickgirl", "futa" and "cuntboy" because... Blegh.

Not in the slightest; a sexualised anthro version of anyone's pet (or any specific IRL animal at all, really) would make me super uncomfortable.

Big sub / small dom is a fun dynamic.

Stumbled upon this and have some thoughts on it; this is something I've been thinking about myself for a while.

I agree with Xero's concerns that the levels seem a bit arbitrary, and I've got a "counter proposal" for how a tag based system could work:

The local instance's community description contains a number of entries like the following:

• [](cw:defaultallow:yiff)
• [](cw:defaultblock:feral)
• [](alwaysblock)

The instance itself will have a list of these tags and what each means available, both for community moderators and remote instance admins.

The remote instance, in its settings, has two lists of tags, a whitelist and a blacklist.

A community is automatically marked as hidden when any of the following are true:

• A defaultallow or defaultblock tag apperas in its blacklist.
• A defaultblock tag does not appear in its whitelist.
• The alwaysblock entry is present.

This would allow remote instance admins to freely customize what they allow and disallow, while giving the local instance the ability to set sensible defaults in case something is missing from the remote's blacklist. This does put a bit of pressure on the local instance admin to specify what it wants this "sensible default" to be, but that's something that they already need to do when specifying where they draw the line between what's NSFW and not NSFW anyway.

Some advantages for this is that it could be expanded to handle content warnings in post titles as well, and allow instances to filter things that wouldn't traditionally be seen as nsfw (such as politics, bot posts, AI art and so on).

Just some thoughts I had, hopefully it all makes sense.

/uj For what it's worth, as someone who posts quite a bit of stuff there, I also wish full instance per-user blocks were a thing. I like that stuff, but I understand some people don't and rather not force furry tiddies on them. ;_;

/rj But yes, certainly avoid yiffit.net if you don't like that sort of thing. :P

Edit: To those wondering if their instance is blocking it, afaik lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works do not. You can check the instance list at the bottom of the page. Or I guess check if you can see this comment, since my account is on there.

You also won't see furry porn if you have nsfw off in the settings. Or if you don't linger in r/all for too long (there's only like 5 of us posting regularly, it's easy for it to get drowned out).