The longer the half life, the less radiation it emits per time. (Or at least that's what a quick web search says.) So the initially produced radioactive products will emit a ton of radiation per time, but have a short half life and they will quickly become the next element in the series, which will be less radioactive per time but will stick around longer, and then repeat repeat repeat. Each next element it becomes will give off less radiation per time but will be in existence for longer.
The geyser eruption has nothing to do with climate change
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/23/travel/yellowstone-hydrothermal-explosion
"charged with felony malicious injury to property"
What we want is money out of politics. That's the goal. But since that isn't currently the situation, then until that happens it's good for the non-fascist to get donations.
What did this same poll from reuters/ipsos say previously when biden was the candidate?
Evil AND dumb. Stealing from kids who are having a hard childhood, and defrauding the government in a way that'll get caught by a standard audit. I hope she has to pay it all back too
That wouldn't be better for the company. They probably don't make money on selling the hardware.
I'm far from an expert on this, but I would guess the safety of being outdoors heavily depends on additional factors, like for example wind direction and speed.
A very fit athletic person who has done endurance training can do 30 miles in a day, but that's not typical. Most people could do around 10+ if their life literally depended on it like in the aftermath of a nuke
Source: a brief web search