Buddahriffic @ Buddahriffic @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

4,657

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

The whole "they need to be invited in before they can enter your home" always struck me as a weird one. What would happen if a vampire just ignored that and entered anyways? What if someone considered a forest their home? What if squatters moved in to the vampire's home? Or some official declared it belonged to someone else? What if they are invited by someone who doesn't live there?

It's not even the squirrels you need to worry about directly, it's any fleas or biting bugs (can ticks carry it?) that have recently bitten one of those squirrels.

There was a series on Netflix that used this. It was alright though probably got cancelled. Can't remember the name of it.

Unless it's to give them physical support getting through a voting line designed to make people wonder if they should leave the line for survival sake. In which case they don't want anyone doing it, homeless or not.

He was getting paid peanuts for designing and building an essential system for the running of the park all on his own, working for a guy that constantly bragged about sparing no expense.

IIRC the only interaction between Hammond and Nerdy went something like "you should have negotiated a better contract! Stfu gbtw", which can pretty much sum up the whole wealth divide between the owners who gain most of the benefit and the workers who actually do the things under capitalism. Except if they aren't getting the better of everyone on average, they just shut the whole thing down or find others that they do get the better of.

I see 6.

Edit: oh 7 actually.

My mom would always tell me that I wouldn't like the baker's chocolate she would use in baking when I'd ask to try a piece.

Then, one day, she decided to just let me try it, probably expecting me to be grossed out or something. But I love dark chocolate and liked it anyways, even if it didn't exactly match my expectations at the time.

One area that it really helps for me is executive function. There's a lot of things that I'm capable of doing, even quickly, but I've got this mental block that just makes me not want to do it. But if I can just write out some instructions and have a system do the rest, it's much easier to get going.

I'll still think through the problem and approach using AI to help coding at a "I need a function that will take this data in this format and do x, y, z to it and return that data in that format" level rather than something like a higher level description of my final goal.

Is it faster than what I could do if I focused on programming and get on a good roll? I dunno, it might still be. Is it faster than me actually trying to program something in the reality that I often exist in? Fuck yeah.

And even debugging and testing go way smoother. For one thing, I don't have to deal with stupid typo bugs anymore. And for the bugs that still make it in, AI has been great at taking an idea of how to examine the data that would be a pain to implement and just doing it for me, especially if it involves some obscure API or language features since I don't have to spend time finding its existence and then learning it (if it's a one off, I won't likely retain anything other than the existence part, which I can still get from looking at the AI generated code).

So it's pretty great for programmers who know their shit but ADHD gets in the way of using it in a timely manner. It's better than an intern, which is good for me but sucks for those who need to learn. There's a good chance AI's semi-competence if hand held by an expert is going to lead to a big lack of talent as those experts age out. Though with how quickly it's improving, it might not even need the hand holding by then. I'm not sure which possibility is scarier.

I got my daughter some Percy Jones (Jackson? The novels that put the greek pantheon in stories set in this day) as novels for her to read with me during bed time reading time a few years back and holy shit @ the number of references just peppered through the thing. I'd have to spend 5 minutes explaining things for her to fully understand each paragraph, even ignoring the tough words to sound out. Maybe she was just too young (she was 8, just when her reading really took off), though I probably would have missed a lot of them when I was a teenager. Especially the ones referencing life in NYC.

It came off as pretentious, like the author wanted to show off knowing about a bunch of things more than he wanted to tell a story. It was exhausting and we didn't get very far into the book.

None of the references were internet ones, from what I recall.

I am highly skilled at pedantry and enjoy challenging arbitrary lines. I bet there's even a way to argue that we're all stones or made up of the same stuff as them.

Does sand count as stones?

Glad you're still alive, bud.

Yeah, the showing off is what I was getting at. The first experiment seemed more like an experiment and an accident but the demonstrations with the screwdriver seemed more like someone doing pull-ups over a fatal drop just to show how badass they are and accidentally landing on other people on the bottom when he slipped.

Thanks for the in depth response though, this gives more context to this than I've had before.

And just guessing on the other two attitudes before looking anything up (haha maybe wanting to challenge my intuition like this instead of just looking it up is one), one is probably related to laziness (eg assuming something is fine and doesn't need to be checked when going through the pre flight checklist). And maybe the other is being too trusting or not assertive enough (eg colleague says something is OK, you don't fully believe them but don't challenge them on it). Am I close?

Probably an attempt to avoid repeating the mistake and letting gen alpha see how easy millennials and gen z have it compared to what they'll have. Gen alpha monopoly will probably involve watching ads to stay in the game because they don't have any money in the first place.

I remember occasionally seeing a 64k connection speed on the dialup at my parents' old place before they finally got broadband. No idea if it was accurate, as I understand 56k to be a physical limitation on phone lines, but it's what windows would claim at least.

What was the point of these approaching criticality experiments anyways?

Has it ever been proven in any of the shows that the transporter didn't kill everyone that used it and just made such prefect copies that no one realized?

Like it created an extra copy of Riker and there was the tragedy of Tuvix. Though I'd say the former is evidence that it is new copies but the latter might be evidence against it, since they each had memories of their time merged when they separated. Actually, that whole incident kinda brings into question what's going on for a transporter to accidentally merge two people and not in a "horrible teleportation into a wall accident" way and then somehow de-merge them.

Not in Canada. Unless they want to go out of business.

Rick rolls saved the internet from random goatse/tubgurl/2girls1cup.

So... Did you guys eventually get the kinky glassware you ordered and did they make you return the chemistry glassware they accidentally sent?

Oh no, it shouldn't take a day to get to the cupboard and back. I think OP is dead or maybe just incapacitated or napping.