I don't think the first Cities Skylines shipped with bikes either? Wasn't it part of the After Dark DLC? Or maybe that was just bike lanes? I hate the DLC for Paradox games... It's so confusing that I think I'm just not going to buy their games anymore.

I guess you're just talking about one person, but I think Cities Skylines was received quite well in general? I just remember a bunch of praise for Cities Skylines (in contrast to Sim City 2013 which a bunch of people had a meltdown about).

Thanks :). I've actually been looking for the RSVP stuff and I wasn't sure which RFC to look through (wasn't sure if it was in the CalDAV one or the iCalendar one... and they're weirdly huge). I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction!

Also was curious how they were implementing reactions in e-mail. I actually think it's a good feature, and it's one that's slowly been making it into XMPP and stuff. Emoji reactions and stuff sound kind of dumb and like a "whatever, who cares?" feature, but I find that on platforms like slack they're actually a really good way to deal with quickly confirming something / finalizing decisions / quickly gauging the opinion of a group. I think a huge problem with e-mail and instant messaging is that they can be quite noisy, so having a "quiet" way to respond without having a thread explode is actually pretty welcome in my opinion.

Which RFCs are you referring to?

Of course, I don't think we're actually in danger of bacteria suddenly eating through plastic like it's a moldy apple or anything... Obviously wood is still hard to break down, and plastics aren't too dissimilar. It's just kind of cool that we can build something super cheaply out of plastic and it will hold up well in the elements without much care at all.

At the risk of sounding super ignorant the desire for plastic to biodegrade always seems really short-sighted to me? I understand that there are problems with plastic pollution for the ecosystem and that there may be health concerns with microplastics and whatnot... And that we probably shouldn't make so many disposable items that we do want to degrade out of plastic (and that we should probably not have as many disposable items in the first place)... But plastics are also kind of miracle materials and ideally you want them to not break down in many use cases. Like, wouldn't it be bad if all of a sudden we have bacteria that will eat through blood bags and plastic structures?

It seems like this article is mostly talking about studying microbes to design plastic eating enzymes that will help efficiently recycle plastic in the future, and that sounds super cool and very useful. But the whole "we should have bacteria that can quickly break down plastic in the environment" angle that I hear about a lot seems kind of risky to me because one of the reasons plastics are so awesome is that they're very resistant to degradation... Maybe I'm just ignorant, though.

You learned you had a self-cleaning fan, so you decided to clean it every time?

I'd agree that "it gets better later" isn't a good way to promote a game, but I dunno that a game has to be good (or at least at its best) from the start. Totally understandable if people don't want to, or can't invest the time into something that doesn't grip them right away, but at least for me a slow start can be really nice, especially when a game ends up unfolding in unexpected ways later on. I can enjoy that kind of pacing, and sometimes it's rewarding to have something start off kind of painful for one reason or another and become something much greater. At least personally I think a "weak start" can end up making the full experience better overall, as it's kind of a part of the journey.

But of course, if you're not enjoying it and you don't want to continue and you want to refund it... That's totally reasonable! A game that's a slow burn is probably a much harder sell and not going to appeal to as broad of an audience, and I think that's okay.

It's a bit odd... I guess people just want to feel justified in their own beliefs about the thing which manifests as anger. But I think there's often perfectly reasonable justifications for these things too... Like, Uber and Lyft both required drivers to mask, so it's perfectly reasonable for them to just keep the mask on between picking up passengers, and in that case it really wouldn't be useless... Maybe somebody is picking somebody up or just dropped somebody off and feels more comfortable keeping the mask on in the meantime... Maybe it's just easier to put the mask on at home and they don't want to fiddle with it during the day... Or maybe it's completely pointless, but it doesn't harm anybody so who cares?

Honestly, I've just found the response to COVID (particularly in the USA) really depressing to the point where I just don't want to be around people anymore. I guess just all of the selfishness and vitriol about the whole thing really took a toll on me.

Yeah, and I mean I really want people to be better about masking when it matters too... But I think it's best to not get too mad about the people who are trying and making some questionable tradeoffs of comfort / effectiveness or whatever. I don't understand all of the weird things people do with masks, and it'd be nice if we could actually talk to people and say "hey, are you wearing a mask to protect yourself or others? I think this is making it a lot less effective!" and have people be receptive to that, because there probably are some people that just don't think about it too much and don't realize... But it's difficult to have those conversations without it feeling confrontational, especially when the whole thing has become such a contentious issue.

I'm sure it's a mix of things. Some of it's probably a lack of understanding, and sometimes it's a "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" situation. They might have their mask on and ready to go for situations where they might want to mask up or where somebody else might want them to mask up... Or... Whatever. Maybe even some people take it off to talk (which is frustrating) because they think it's easier to communicate that way and worth the risk to themselves and others and they'll pull it back up after because it still does limit exposure overall? I dunno. Maybe I shouldn't speculate too much. I guess I've been on the other side of this where a bunch of people were complaining about people wearing masks outside alone because it's "stupid and pointless" and I've definitely done that when going between places because it was just easier to keep the thing on for me (especially since I try to have it fit really well).

"Ah, finally some fresh air"

It’s already worse than this because nobody will even tell you what anything costs.

I was a sad Dvorak typist :(. You don’t want to make Dvorak users sad, it’s punching down.

This was my immediate thought as well. It's unfortunate, but there will probably always be people who abuse online platforms like this. It's totally okay if you're not up to the task of moderating disturbing content like that --- it sounds like it can be a really brutal job. I don't know what the moderation tools on Lemmy are like, but maybe there's a way to flag different kinds of moderation concerns for different moderators (so not everybody has to be exposed to this kind of stuff if they're not comfortable with it). And maybe there could also be a system where if user's flag the post it can be automatically marked as NSFW and images can be hidden by default so moderators and other users don't have to be exposed to it without warning (though of course such a system could potentially be abused as well). But beyond that I'm not sure what else you can do, aside from maybe limiting federation.

I've been thinking lately that I kind of miss things like IRC where you couldn't really post pictures in chat. With things like Discord and Slack the off topic channels often devolve into people just sharing random memes they found funny at the time, and not really talking to each other. I'm sure there's value in that too, but I think it can take up a lot of oxygen in the social space, so I'm not sure it's always a win. Different formats encourage different ways of interacting with each other, I guess, and it's interesting!

For some reason I find it really unlikely that Google would support a product for 10 years. They don't exactly have a great track record...

I really want to like playing games on my phone, but I absolutely hate it for similar reasons. I guess some people might pair Bluetooth controllers or something which might make it better for these kinds of games, but still… either way I have yet to find a touchscreen based game that I actually want to play. The closest I’ve gotten is chess and go.

It’s insane to me that they’ve dropped every other API… They should really support Vulkan.

Yeah monitors are my primary problem too. Can’t get them to work properly at all through the thunderbolt dock.