At this rate, you won't be for long.
I've heard this before, but I never understood how people find this easier. It's still the exact same maze, you just swap the "start" and "goal" labels.
You used a completely different scenario in which the only commonality is "one person killed another". The motive behind the two scenarios is entirely different, and literally the crux of the charges he's facing. I'm not sure what sort of point you're trying to make.
What, exactly, do they think they deserve?
No, I can see that. What I don't understand is why. "If the situation were different, then the situation would be different" isn't really saying anything, so I'm not sure what the point of that was.
Luigi is a mass murderer?
There was fine print at one point during the stream that specified that 4K will be limited to 60 FPS.
You gotta press the C button first, to ask them.
I was in a CAL-O team back in my CS days. Not saying this to brag (clearly, as CAL-O was definitely not top tier), just to credential my own opinion as I'm no stranger to competitive FPS play, myself.
It does not matter what you do. If there is anything altering the players inputs whatsoever those players need to be playing against only other people with those same assists and controls.
I don't necessarily agree that the two are incompatible, even for comp/ranked play. Even if you segregate controller and M/K players, the players in the controller pool aren't necessarily all playing with the same controller (third-party or Pro/Elite controllers are fairly common), and the players in the M/K pool are definitely not all playing with the same peripherals.
Some controller players will have extra buttons, paddles, or gyro aiming that other players won't; and it's probably rare to find two players in any M/K lobby using the same mouse. Even in a PC-only lobby, the player with the $400 RGB HyperTactical GX Mountain Dew & Knuckles mouse is going to have an intrinsic advantage over the player using the 2-button mouse that came with the Dell Optiplex he bought at a yard sale. So either way, neither matchmaking pool has players on a truly even playing field to begin with, and somebody's choice in their input method is likely to give them some sort of advantage over others in their lobby.
If we want to game in a truly fair, competitive environment, then we should do it like sports leagues do and ensure all players are using standard-issued equipment so that the only variable is the individual skill of the players. But there's a million reasons why that can't happen though, so we have to accept some amount of compromise to fairness in order to make games playable.
Ultimately, if the concern is "aim assist is too strong on controller", then I think that's a quality control issue on the developers' part, and something that can be remedied. I don't think the right solution is "split the player base into sequestered factions", even though it's an easy solution. Because you also need to consider that the input method isn't the only factor deciding any encounter between players. If it were, then you could give the top M/K players a controller and they'd skyrocket through the leaderboards. And vise-versa, the top controller players should start landing all their flick shots once they switch to M/K. But they don't, because just like in traditional sports, familiarity with the equipment is just as important as one's ability and game knowledge.
Another often-overlooked issue, which nobody wants to hear, is that there 100% exists an attitude among many M/K players of "he's on controller, so there's no way he can be better at the game than me". A lot of times, the balance between controller and M/K is just fine, and players are just finding themselves on the uncomfortable end of the Dunning-Kruger curve. And I'm not saying this as some sort of Holy Paladin of Gamepads or anything; I actually prefer M/K. But quite often I see PC players dismiss the skill of console players, because they equate their skill to their platform selection. I'm not accusing you of this, by the way, just mentioning that this is an attitude I see a lot in competitive circles, but never see anybody actually talk about it.
I'm multitasking and dangerously decaffeinated as I write this, so I'm sorry if I'm rambling and not making any sense lol.
There are ways of cooking shrimp
No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it.
I mean, it seems pretty clear that Luigi didn't have a personal beef with Thompson directly, but moreso with the political system that allowed Thompson to thrive. I'm not really sure why saying this was politically-motivated is so divisive.
Familiarity, I'd imagine. You go to Chipotle in any part of any city, and you already know what's on their menu, how much it'll cost, and how it'll taste. But smaller restaurants, even a local chain, can vary wildly from store to store, and most people probably don't want to spend their limited lunch time experimenting with restaurants they're unfamiliar with.
It depends on the game, really. Some games balance controller and M/K inputs very well, and I appreciate cross-play in those games. In my experience, Apex is particularly bad about their input balancing and gives way too much advantage to controller users, which is why XIM/Cronus cheating is so prevalent.
But, you can definitely still have a competitive and fair balance between inputs. Destiny 2 was actually really good about this, and their weapons team did a LOT of work to make sure that matches between console and PC players felt good even at high levels of play, and they nailed it, imo. I think part of the way Bungie made it work was by making every weapon have intrinsic aim assist, even on M/K. This allowed them to tweak that value for each input mode, so that guns felt right regardless of what you played with.
And the tradeoff wasn't just "extra bullet magnetism in exchange for slower aim speed", they also increased the visual recoil and screen shake effects for controller users, so that the aim assist wasn't completely free, all on a per-weapon basis. Despite Bungie's flaws and numerous missteps with Destiny, this is something that I don't think they get nearly enough credit for.
His manifesto suggests political motives more than personal ones.
Just for what it's worth, you don't need CSAM in the training material for a generative AI to produce CSAM. The models know what children look like, and what naked adults look like, so they can readily extrapolate from there.
The fact that you don't need to actually supply any real CSAM to the training material is the reasoning being offered for supporting AI CSAM. It's gross, but it's also hard to argue with. We allow for all types of illegal subjects to be presented in porn; incest, rape, murder, etc. While most mainstream sites won't allow those types of material, none of them are technically outlawed - partly because of freedom of speech and artistic expression and yadda yadda, but also partly because it all comes with the understanding that it's a fake, made-for-film production and that nobody involved had their consent violated, so it's okay because none of it was actually rape, incest, or murder. And if AI CSAM can be made without actually violating the consent of any real people, then what makes it different?
I don't know how I feel about it, myself. The idea of "ethically-sourced" CSAM doesn't exactly sit right with me, but if it's possible to make it in a truly victimless manner, then I find it hard to argue outright banning something just because I don't like it.
There are some devices that do this, but as you've already noted, they're crazy expensive. There's cheap(er) ways to accomplish the same thing, though.
Assuming you don't need to do any heavy-duty computing on either screen, you could probably get away with a very cheap laptop for the primary display, and something like a Wacom display tablet for the touchscreen element. I'm not sure how compatible such touchscreen displays are with Chromebooks, but most Chromebooks easily have Linux installed on them, which I'd imagine has much better support. Or pretty much any low-spec Windows laptop would also work just fine.
You could probably get away with a decent setup like this for the $500-600 range. The tablet could rest over the keyboard of the laptop, or if you're clever with drafting and have access to a 3D printer, you could probably easily print yourself a mount of some sort to secure the touch display over the laptop keyboard to avoid pressing keys and give it a more intentional design. I don't know how well using an on-screen keyboard would feel, so something modular like this, where you could easily expose the real keyboard without too much fuss, may be a good route to take.
For file management, especially if you plan on interacting with a file on both screens at any point, that would get very cumbersome very quickly.
I'd "love" to see Trump run off a bridge.
Wake up babe, new cat color just dropped.
Stand-up comic, Steve Hofstetter, explains firing his agency for signing Kanye West
THE FINALS - A community for players of the free-to-play FPS game, The Finals
This creepy short film from just over seven years ago hits a little different lately |ＬＯＣＡＬ５８ＴＶ - Contingency
