Corn @ Corn @lemmy.ml Posts 0Comments 13Joined 3 mo. ago
Not really, because somehow a libertarian society where you can own slaves is less "authoritarian" than a socialist society where everyone is fed, housed, because the poor capitalists don't get the power to exploit people.
Meanwhile a primitive anarchist commune with so little development of the means of production, a person's only options are to fill a very specific role in society or starve becomes free again.
The term "authoritarian" is not useful for describing how much agency people in a society have over their own lives.
What are you gonna do, vote for the guy who wants to put 10 holes in the boat? No, you have to vote for me, I will only put 9 more holes in the boat.
Don't try to take away my gun or tell me to stop putting holes in the boat. What do you want Trump to win?
Other than take the gun from the liberal to save us all, wtf could he have done?
It wasn't just Trump, Dem governors and mayors had an opportunity to fill in where the federal government was failing, and instead we got Cuomo going on CNN every night to talk about how important it is to balance human health and the economy.
I would hardly call “so greedy I’m ok with an extreme racist regime as long as I keep on getting mine” moderate
This describes anyone who is OK with the country tho? I mean America didn't start being racist in 2016
You only believe that because the democrats almost exclusively run on the most compromised versions of policies that 9/10 people assume won't help them. Look at social democracies, and how touching people's healthcare is so toxic even conservatives run on bolstering healthcare. Obama won by a huge margin in 2008 because people thought they'd get free healthcare. Then they got means-tested subsidies for health insurance through an employer they could buy on a marketplace.
Voters understand "You will go to a doctor and they will treat you and give you medicine for free, you won't have to pay $10,000 a year for health insurance, and then more when you actually need healthcare, and you won't have to fill out any complicated forms". And everybody knows someone who has been fucked by medical debt or forgone medical care because they couldn't afford it or put it off to another year because they didn't meet that year's deductible.
They understand "free child care" or "monthly check for $500 per child", but "tax credits based on eligibility" and most voters will assume it won't help them, but they will be paying for someone "undeserving".
Unpopular policy decreases turnout. That's just how democracy works. The narrative of blaming the voters just serves to distract from the only people who could have changed the outcome of the last election and will be the only ones who can change the outcome of future lessons.
If Trump runs for a third term, and the democrats run on building the wall and defunding the government, the same fucking thing will happen.
OK, and then the democrats run on Trump's 2024 platform in 2028 and we either get the same policies Biden never pushed back on, or the dems lose again.
The only way for the dems to win in 2026 and 2028 is if they listen to the base.
Several domains about dunking on liberals.
When communists talk about liberals, they're talking about anyone who is pro-capitalism.
you certainly didn’t help him NOT win!
What did you do to get the democrats to stop the bad policies and genocide that caused them to lose?
Or did you simply try to convince people that they should shut up about these things because Trump would be worse and you understood that the democrats changing course even if they knew they were on a losing trajectory was never in the cards?
Or Pelosi and co can just tell literally anyone "Hey, our polls have Biden at 5% chance, and Kamala couldn't even win her own state in the primary. Your policies poll better than anyone else in congress, if you don't run, Trump will win."
But it would have been easier just to tell Kamala "Hey, these are the policies that will give you the best turnout, free healthcare, free college, rent control/lower housing costs, tax cuts for the workers, increased taxes on billionaires." and tell Biden "Here's a stack of executive orders, they directly improve the conditions of the people we need to vote for us. The SCOTUS will complain, laugh at them. Also stop sending weapons to Israel you fucking monster"
The only way the dems could have won in 2024 is if they did what is popular with their base. This applies to literally every election. You should be furious that they lost to Donald fucking Trump twice because they thought they could win while enacting policies they knew would decrease turnout.
They have their own polling, they know there's not a bunch of voters who just hate tiktok and will vote for tax credits to buy healthcare for first-generation college grads who run a small business in an under-served community for 3 years, but won't vote for free healthcare.
No messaging could have made genocide in gaza popular, it's not the people telling the democrats to stop giving Israel fucking bombs who made facilitating genocide unpopular. The only people who could have changed whether Palestine hurt the dems or helped them were the dems. They decided unlimited support for a genocidal settler colonial state was more important than winning.
Why doesn't the article tell us exactly what those demands are? Last time the sticking point was that Israel would resume bombing in 2 weeks and continue occupying parts of Gaza.
Merry Christmas
Hamas was supported by Israel to fight Fatah, not the PA. The Palestinian Authority is an Israeli puppet.