The above comment is an example of this getting waved away.
The type of capitalism found in China is known as state capitalism and it's an unholy blend of central planning and free markets, with the government owning significant stakes in all key industries, exerting a massive control over both the economy and society as a whole using all of the methods used by previous Communist autocracies, only this time with far more technology.
This is built from scratch. There is no reason to use an antique cannon barrel for this - and it's not like those are lying around in Syria, whereas material and equipment to manufacture this is far easier to come by.
I believe this is one of the famous Omar cannons:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvised_artillery_in_the_Syrian_civil_war#Omar_cannon
Easily one of the most sophisticated Syrian hell cannons. It's breach-loading, it has a recoil damper and it's mounted on a strong enough truck chassis. They are even seemingly hitting what they are actually intending to hit, which is far from guaranteed with these kinds of improvised artillery pieces.
Firing unguided rockets at population centers is not fighting back, it's simply terrorism. These things have an accuracy measured in kilometers. No sane person would applaud this.
What's your plan? How do you combat a terrorist organization that interprets any kind gesture, any attempt at normalization as weakness and uses it as pretext to attack? Should I remind you how Hamas has reacted to past concessions?
Yeah, no. This comment alone would go against any government NDA - and this user is just some random person who, going by their comment history, most certainly has no inside knowledge of anything.
I sometimes wonder what needs to happen to people in order for them to confidently write nonsense like this.
I sometimes wonder what needs to happen to people in order for them to confidently write nonsense like this.
So if you're wearing a bulletproof vest and somebody shoots at you and either misses or hits the vest, are you not allowed to shoot back? Are you supposed to just stand there and let the attacker continue until they succeed?
Keep in mind that every single Hamas rocket attack means a disruption of daily life, with people only having seconds to rush to shelter. It's stressful and traumatic, to the point that a few months ago, a nine year old with a preexisting condition died from a heart attack that was caused by the fear and stress of being under attack:
There is nothing safe about it. All the Iron Dome can do is lower the risk, but it doesn't eliminate it. It doesn't eliminate every one of these unguided rockets and the debris still rains down.
The ironic thing is that for many years, this system saved more Palestinian than Israeli lives, since it allowed Israel to more or less eat these rockets instead of having to strike back every time. After Hamas used a rocket barrage as cover on October 7 - which they also used to murder people hiding in shelters that they had the terrorists knew the locations of - Israel cannot ignore these attacks anymore. The risk is too great now that it's not "just" a rocket attack, that it's part of a larger assault, perhaps a further escalation, e.g. with rockets that aren't just filled with explosives, but perhaps with dangerous substances as well.
It seems like the entire industry is in pure panic about AI, not just Google. Everyone hopes that LLMs will end years of homeopathic growth through iteration of long-existing technology, which is why it attracts tons of venture capital.
Google, which sits where IBM was decades ago, is too big, too corporate and too slow now, so they needed years to react to this fad. When they finally did, all they were able to come up with was a rushed equivalent of existing LLMs that suffers from all of the same problems.
Just tell them you're not drinking alcohol for health reasons. Nobody will really disagree with you on this.
It's an unholy alliance of both, I'd argue.
Get one of those gamepad cradles with USB-C (but don't cheap out on it).
They were warned repeatedly not to give Al Jazeera access to this footage, yet they refused. No army in the world wants live footage of their troops being broadcast - and especially not shared with a network that belongs to a hostile nation, one that directly supports Hamas and houses their leadership.
Al Jazeera is just as much an enemy of the free world as RT is. They are not press. Real journalists should distance themselves as much from this propaganda outlet as possible instead of working with them.
I agree. The only application that is fine for this in my opinion is using it solely for entertainment, as a toy.
The problem is of course that everyone and their mothers are pouring billions into what clearly should only be used as a toy, expecting it to perform miracles it currently can not and might never be able to pull off.
Its not chatgpt that’s just default config u can use the API endpoint to point to any chatgpt api compatible llm.
Since the issue with hallucinations is shared by all LLMs, not just ChatGPT, this doesn't change anything.
Are you seriously trying to push your ChatGPT "tool" in response to an article about language models like this one having substantial issues? "Not guaranteed" - yes, obviously, that's the point of the article - and from a quick look at your code, I don't see how this nonsense addresses any of that.