I don't see how this is in China's interests at this point. Committing to a position right now just presents more risks than potential rewards.
Ah that makes sense. In the US, I don't hear a lot of chatter blaming the war for our woes, just the usual partisan politics stuff
but now people are increasingly connecting the war with their declining standard of living. This is now translating into a political backlash against the people who championed the war.
Could you elaborate on this? I dont follow. How is our standaed of living connected to this war?
One lib group I have eyes on called 2014 an uprising to replace a Russian puppet
I have no idea what landback entails. That's why I asked. I get what OP was mocking here. I want to know what the actual advocates for this are seeking, not what reactionary opponents assume they are seeking
Genuine question: What would returning look like practially? Isn't most land stolen from indiginous groups in general? Would we see people ofnforeigb descent emigrating back to nations of historical origin? Or is this a question of who governs the land, and not who resides on it?
Or that Nordstream 2's sabotage wasn't a false-flag perpetrated by the very people that benefitted from it the most, and not their mortal enemies!