Please tell me, scientifically, why you are so sure that people of faith are wrong?
Because they all offer competing and mutually exclusive hypotheses.
Christianity tells us that the one true path to salvation is by accepting Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour.
Hinduism tells us that our next life will take place in this world, based on our actions in this life.
Islam tells us that Mohammed is the one true prophet.
Buddhism says that there are no prophets, enlightenment only comes from within.
They make contradictory claims, so by definition they can't all be right, and they typically claim that they are correct and the other explanations are false, so even if one religion is correct, the rest (comprising of the majority of the faithful) must be wrong.
Google Messages definitely supports dual SIM, I have a physical SIM and an eSIM in my device and you can choose which one it sends from on a message by message basis
Dismantling the regime. If someone said we need to eliminate the Chinese Communist regime, would you think they want to destroy the entirety of China?
Pretty ironic seeing Rolling Stone of all publications displaying a disapproving stance on drug use
Well, one of Australia's high profile war criminals was punished with a cushy media executive job
It's not good at all for society. It's slavery with the addition of a heightened risk of death, all to serve the whims of guys in suits far from the battlefield.
Previous commenter thinking it's a good thing because it will whip the rabble into shape is delirious. These are peoples sons and daughters that we would be sending off to die in the mud. Shameful.
I don't recall the previous commenter mentioning anything about Facebook. Making a comment that is anti something doesn't automatically mean they're pro something else.
Step 1: Feel like getting into a comment section argument
Step 2: Put words in the other guy's mouth and argue against those
Step 3: Make yourself look like a bit of a tool
Is this the best use of your time?
Private companies are valued all the time, typically it's by calculating a multiple of EBITDA, with some variations for particular industries
Musk said. "If you get to the 100 million vehicle level, which I think we will … you've got a kilowatt of useable compute," Musk said.
A whole kilowatt? "I think you could have on the order of 100 gigawatts of useful compute." Ah.
"And unlike laptops and our cell phones, it is totally under Tesla's control," Musk added.
They clearly seem to think that they can do whatever they want with their customer's property
don't come with a requirement that drivers watch the road
Seems it's like every other Mercedes then
If you wanted to do something like this you could put the charger on one of those electrical plugs with a timer, or a smart plug that's switched on when the battery reaches a certain threshold
Models are getting more efficient and hardware is getting more powerful, it's completely feasible that open source, self hosted, GPT4 equivalent and better models will be completely viable to run as individuals for reasonable costs (hundreds, not thousands) in the not too distant future.
As always, the will and knowledge to use the tools falls to the individual.
Claudine Gay was right to resign, if the very top position at a university is occupied by someone with no academic integrity, then that will spread like an infection.
It's more than just brushing and flossing, they grind off plaque etc. Preventative maintenance for teeth basically.
Churches are for-prophet though
Card numbers follow a stamdard format and have digits that represent the payment provider (eg Visa, Mastercard, AMEX) and the issuing credit provider, along with a checksum, but also guessing the corresponding expiry date and CVV has a vanishingly small chance.
Things like "MP approves funding for new hospital" don't make headlines. Even moreso for any world headlines to rise above the din of American politics it usually has to be something pretty outrageous.