'Veterans on Patrol': Inside MAGA's new assault on reality and bizarre conspiracy theory
FirstCircle @ FirstCircle @lemmy.ml Posts 198Comments 395Joined 2 yr. ago

FirstCircle @ FirstCircle @lemmy.ml
Posts
198
Comments
395
Joined
2 yr. ago
Baby dies after California mom leaves him in car to get lip filler on 101-degree day, police say
Nearly 800 infant remains found in septic tank at nun-run Irish unwed mother and baby home
Two major immigration protests erupted in Spokane on Wednesday, sparking a massive police response
Patty Murray grills VA secretary over planned layoffs, handling of computer system rollout
St. Maries parents won't know which teachers will have guns next year
US Justice Dept mobilized armed Marshals to warn ex-lawyer over congressional testimony
NOAA issues critical drought warnings during cuts to agency
We Found Widespread Abuse of Disabled Patients at an Illinois Facility. The DOJ Is Investigating.
Oh, I see. It was satire.
Not to be confused with sarcasm. In writing it's a well-known (I'd thought) technique going back thousands of years. In pre-Idiocracy times, roughly before the widespread use of cell phones and when people read written texts to become informed and for pleasure, satire was common and there were writers who were well-known for specializing in the mode. The quality of the satire was always debatable (as with the quality of any art offering) but it was normally always recognized as satire by people who were able to read it in the first place. In the case of written satire, while it might be accompanied by illustrations to emphasize one point or another, it didn't require images or animations or the equivalent of "emojis" near the text in question in order to signify to the reader that satire was being employed. The text was self-evident as being satirical, or if not, could be understood from the context to be satire (if it was contained in a satirical book for example).
As for what I wrote, I would have expected that the absurd concepts (government-controlled turbines designed to change the weather both by harnessing the power of winds and by creating new winds by acting as giant fans; describing these "fans" as being able to move people and extremely heavy machinery with great accuracy, again under government control) and borrowed nutter phraseology along with depictions of nutter-like outrage, would have made it apparent that satire was what was on offer. I understand that some may think if to be of poor quality, but I'm surprised that some people cannot recognize the writing as satire at all.
Pre-Idiocracy this would rarely have been a problem, even when the writing appeared in a low-context medium such as an isolated web page or in a forum or Usenet posting. It may be that the satirical written form is now, in Idiocratic times, extinct except to specialized academics and historians and other educated elites. That would be a shame because it was a powerful (influential) communication tool and is a pleasure to write and to read.