Skip Navigation
Deleted
*Permanently Deleted*
  • That works, too. (And probably closer to what I was thinking, honestly.)

  • Deleted
    *Permanently Deleted*
  • There's room for it, under the right conditions, but... this feels completely wrong in almost every direction. Section 31, as a collective group, should not feel like a bad rip off of Guardians of the Galaxy. Absolutely the wrong tone.

    I will give it a fair shot, however, since it won't cost me anything but my time. :P

  • Untold Story Of Emperor Georgiou To Be Told In ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Comic Book Tie-In
  • I really, really, really hope this ends up being like Lower Decks where I was very skeptical of it going in, but ended up loving it.

    Because everything about this is actively repelling me.

  • Interview: Jonathan Del Arco Talks “Borg Spin-Off” That Became ‘Star Trek: Picard’ And Hugh’s Surprise Death
  • Ugh. Another sour bit of Picard trivia for the pile. Del Arco comes across as a decent fellow. I remember spending all season wondering where the hell this was all going and hoping his character's death -- in the full context -- would make more narrative sense. How blissfully naive I was. :P

    It's crazy that the show I was most hyped for ended up being the one I'd erase from the timeline if I could. Visually gorgeous, with a great cast... but, IMHO, it was far too 'grimdark' for it's own good. That and it's shattershot kitchen-sink approach to storytelling makes it all feel like some fan fiction wet dream in retrospect. Anything positive I could take away from the series is almost completely lost in the noise.

    (Keeping in mind that I keep S1/S2 distinct from S3, which while an improvement, has it's own things going on. 😏)

  • "I'll say this for him, he's consistent."
  • "Dr. Vance... are you wearing makeup...?" (Oops, wrong movie.)

  • Fortyseven Dr. Fortyseven @startrek.website
    • https://Network47.org
    • https://defcon.social/deck/@fortyseven
    Posts 0
    Comments 8