Hey get a load of this guy, can't even expose one lousy US war crime. He's basically complicit
Leave other people's personal property alone, even if they suck.
Some TVs have tech called ACR (Automatic Content Recognition) that literally reads pixels on the screen for identifying information about what content is being displayed. If your TV has ACR enabled, it's possible it's tracking what you watch, even if you're viewing it through a device like Chromecast.
If your TV doesn't have ACR or the TV itself isn't connected to the Internet, then you're probably fine.
You're very welcome, I somehow forgot for some people the most important thing is to hear "you won" and not actually comprehending the conversation. With that context, your previous comments make even more sense. I didn't stand a chance
Do you have any evidence that's what I'm doing? I didn't declare victory. You definitely won this argument!!! I had no chance competing against such an onslaught of arguments unrelated to what I actually said to begin with. I loved the part where you made up a belief system and aspects of my personality at the same time you argued for evidence based conclusions. It really drove your point home! I understand everything clearly now
Oh I get it now, you can't read :(
One point of clarification friend. I never said Lindsey does not support Ukraine. I said his reason for supporting anything is always self-serving, which there is mountains of evidence of. You could wave your hand and do the centrist "whatabout" all politicians being self-serving. But the fact is that Lindsey Graham is one of the most obvious modern examples of flip flopping on issues to benefit himself. If you have a counter example I'd love to read about it.
My original point is that it really doesn't matter what someone like Lindsey says or supports today, because it will change with the wind tomorrow (when he's up for election usually)
You took what I said and made a beautiful little Blue MAGA strawman out of it.
Oh but you and I agree. We both love defending Lindsey Graham and giving him the benefit of the doubt because he's earned it. Keep on fighting the good fight brother
Nope I completely made it up! Certainly Lindsey Graham will never change his stance on Ukraine, that would be a silly thing to think given his historic track record of staying on the same side of issues. I should continue reading and believing things that Lindsey Graham says
Nope I just completely made it up off the top of my head to be a silly guy. Lindsey actually has an impeccable track record of never flip flopping his words or voting against his own stated stances on issues. It's why he's known as one of the greatest and most reputable congresspersons of our generation. He's more than earned the benefit of the doubt wouldn't you say?
Lindsey Graham supports Ukraine
Lindsey Graham doesn't hold a single real position on any issue, other than "what currently benefits me the most?"
I choose this person as the recipient of my hug. I got you bro
I said "such as", because Trump appointed a lot more judges than just her. She's presiding over one of his current cases and is doing everything she can to help Trump. It's more than possible that could happen on future cases against Trump's rivals.
And if their judge was appointed Trump, such as Aileen Cannon?
So, money the company was never going to make anyway then, got it.
I'm not tolerating intolerance. I'm saying stripping voting rights from people is not the right answer. I'm really not sure how you got that twisted...it seems that you agree that removing voting rights and ending democracy would be a bad thing. Yet you're advocating for it anyway? Can you explain that position a bit more clearly?
In my opinion you should spend your political capital and energy on influencing others to vote for candidates you support, rather than spending it advocating for the end of democratic voting in America.