The best part about this is that UMG WMG and SMG all simultaneously went "you can't take an artist's life work and exploit it, that's unfair, it's OUR job to take an artist's life's work and exploit it"

AI isn't "like a person" it doesn't "learn like a person" it doesn't "think like a person" it's nothing like a person. It's a a machine that creates copies of whatever you put into it. It's a machine that a real person, or group of people, own. These people TAKE all the stuff everyone else created and put it into their copy machine.

In fact it's really easy to show that it's a copy machine because the less stuff you put into it the more of a direct copy you get out of it. If you put only one song, or one artist, into it then virtually everything it creates would be direct copyright infringements. If you put all of the worlds music into it the copying becomes more blurred, more complex, more interesting, and therefore more valuable.

Sure AI is a great innovation, but if someone wants to put my work into a copying machine they're going to have to acquire it from me legally.

No one is against AI, we're just against the people who own the AI machines stealing our work without paying for it.

I chose NOT diddling kids!

I think you're mixing copyright which protects works and patients which protect inventions as well as the timelines.

I think the main advantage to fixed stiffness springs was that it was controllable. So if it was a fixed strength magnet the advantages over springs is likely limited compared to the cost. Magnetic suspension is cool because it's an active suspension system.

That sounds like an entrepreneurial opportunity to remedy the situation!

I'm also a bit confused about the fact that good cell service seems to add points, and having dangerous animals also adds points?

That being said, a TREMENDOUS amount of work went into this and I love the infographic. Very well done!

Oh shit France runs things WAY faster than us Canadians. Probably for the best. The longer the campaign is, the more politicians can use bullshit populist fearmongering. Good luck to the French for defeating the fascists.... That just won in France for the EU elections....

She did encourage him, on purpose, because she thought he would be easy to beat. Your source completely supports that, and that was unethical and foolish of her.

However I can't find any evidence that she or the DNC donated to him or his campaign.

Perhaps you can make a small adjustment to correct your comment to avoid the spread of misinformation!

Corporations can't be victims of victim blaming

So you agree that they can be victims of victim blaming

That user that tagged you as "purposeful idiot" was fucking spot on.

A snap election isn't instant lol. An election committee gets formed, a date is set a few months ahead, politicians register and campaign, polling stations are formed and staffed. It's a lot of work. It's like the US but faster and less predictable and therefore not 18 months nightmare of propaganda.

How does that "zero out". A bunch of upper and middle managers embezzling millions somehow cancels the harm of not paying, usually the lowest paid employees, their fair earned wages?

Explain the logic there?

I agree with you, I wish there was a word that only meant "ideas and beliefs not based in objective truth that affect our choices and actions". It would definitely be useful.

I prefer "things which aren't objectively true that we act as if they are true". The first line of the Wikipedia article on ideology uses the same definition more beautiful phrased "An ideology is a set of beliefs or philosophies attributed to a person or group of persons, especially those held for reasons that are not purely epistemic, in which "practical elements are as prominent as theoretical ones""

A good example of an almost universal ideological belief is that "killing is wrong/bad". It's not objectively true, we kill animals, we kill in wars, we euthanize people in medicine. But we act as if it's true none the less in our day to day lives because no one wants to live in a society where killing is generally acceptable, for obvious reasons.

That being said, I don't see anything wrong with what you're saying in a vacuum. I just feel like as soon as you place a naive person in society they begin to interact with and adopt aspects of various ideologies without "deep thought", sometimes even subconsciously.

The beauty culture is a good example of where people will adopt definitions of beauty that are ideological (beautiful people are good, ugly people are bad/dangerous) without conscious effort or deep thought. Then they will act everyday as if they believe in it.

The people who watch Fox news hold complex ideological beliefs, mostly subconsciously. It becomes apparent when you ask them to explain their beliefs that they didn't adopt these ideologies based on deep thought, but will fight fiercely to defend them.

I think that these people's behaviours are driven by ideology even though they themselves weren't the one that did the deep thinking.

Honestly there are good arguments that in complex systems even basic cognitive functions can and will create ideology. An example is birds in a cage with a button that when pressed gives them food. If you disconnect the button then give them food randomly, they're likely to start creating complex dances and rituals based on what they think was responsible for activating the food dispenser. This in a lot of ways mirrors primitive religious behaviour which are certainly ideology.

Perhaps you have another word you prefer to use for deeply held beliefs that affect our behavior but are attained through means other than deep thought?

Good and evil is ideology. Matter has no ideology, no good, no evil.

I might have a broader definition of ideology than you because morality and ethical systems are ideology. Look how many different moral and ethical systems we have. Just choosing between what exists requires ideology first.

Not having empathy isn't enough to be evil. Just like having empathy isn't enough to be good. You need ideology.

For example, the guy who lacks empathy could use basic libertarian or anarchist ideology for why we shouldn't hurt people using logic instead of empathy.

Another example would be if you use fascist ideology you can turn empathy into a weapon for evil. The us vs them ideology requires empathy. The idea is that they are going to hurt the people you love just by existing is what dehumanizes them enough for a normal person to attack them.

It's fucked up, Zionists say "all Jews support Israel because Israel IS Judaism" then when a Jewish person is attacked for what Israel does they say "see, it's the proof they're anti-semites, they attacked a Jewish person outside of Israel, if they were truly only against Israel they wouldn't have done that"

Zionists are literally using all foreign Jews as human shields. Putting them up as defacto Israeli representatives, then as martyrs.

Yeah, big corporate landlords are a problem. Stopping all landlords from jacking up prices is a good thing. This can build momentum for more effective legislation for corporate landlords.

One more time for the slow people I guess:

Housing can't be affordable AND a good investment. Investments have to grow above inflation. Affordable things CAN'T grow above inflation.