Seriously though, I don't follow American electoral politics much, but why didn't they swap him out for someone else? It's a country of ~330m people. Like even the likes of Blinken would have been acceptable to them surely? What's the actual reasoning?
Sounds like a perfectly normal American politician to me.
Is this the same media that ignores his genocide?
"Both sides are the same."
The difference is that one is happening as a response to the other.
The people living there don't want to be a part of a state that tried to ethnically cleanse them, surprise surprise.
The US started the war with the coup. This is just an open secret. Obama is on video admitting it. You're watching too much western propaganda.
In a show about horrible people he literally just played himself.
Works great! Try it. Just a short cycle is all you need.
Good. Their numbers can always use some thinning out
The US wants to slow it down. Europe is just following orders.
So EU taxpayers can stay paying off the massive debts to the USA.
So ban an established language in order to attempt to ethically cleanse a nation from the population and then introduce a virtually alien one from your western masters. This completely destroys all the arguments that were made to support the russian language ban.
The US is flying in hundreds of thugs from one of its puppet states in Africa to brutalise the Haitians and beat them into submission. America bad.
We're rather they didn't.
He and his right-hand man Ousmane Sonko have an anti-colonial stance and want to pull out of the CFA Franc.
France was recently expelled from Niger, and now there is a new blow coming.
In a surprising turn of events, Chinese warships deployed in the Red Sea have reportedly refused to assist Israeli cargo ships in Bab Al-Mandab, despite
"Only China is an arguable peer of the United States, only China’s technological and industrial might can hope to match our own, and only China has the capacity to project power globally as well as regionally."
"China offers a somewhat coherent ideological alternative to the liberal-democratic order."
"China’s one-party meritocracy can advertise itself (...) as a successor to democratic capitalism, an alternative model for the developing world."
"The establishment of Chinese military pre-eminence in East Asia would be a unique geopolitical shock, with dire effects on the viability of America’s alliance systems (...) and on our ability to maintain the global trading system that undergirds our prosperity at home."
The irruption in Israel caught many of us off guard. But to some extents it was a long-expected flashpoint escalation meant to begin the denouement of the Ukrainian conflict, by taking heat off from it. There are many circulating accounts of all the things that seem “off” about Hamas’ attack, so I w...
I wasn't sure where to post this, world news it isn't, so here seems to be a good catch-all comm.
It's a collection of speculations and theories surrounding the war in Palestine and its possible origins.
The guy was "removed from the anchor chair" the shortly after this.
@bidetmarxman: In 2022, Nord Stream was bombed, forcing Germany to import gas from the US. In 2023, the govt of Niger—France's largest supplier of uranium—was overthrown in a coup. Are these events connected? 🧵 Sinc...…
While I very much sympathise with the stance of always suspecting the USA first and foremost whenever anything happens in geopolitics, I'm not sure if I credit it with this much competence.
A main question for Ukraine since it became an independent state was who or what could potentially guarantee its security.
I don't know if it's just this sub or what but I was shocked to see sinophobic crap being shutdown here!