NuraShiny [any] @ NuraShiny @hexbear.net

Posts

1

Comments

888

Joined

4 yr. ago

Good point! This is definitely also a factor.

I'm not sure what you mean? Didn't you go to biology class?! lol

True genius is never appreciated in it's time.

Like guys, hear me out....I think the problem here isn't the people, it's ...wait for it...the economy!

Arrested as well?! For being racist?! Waow. Who coulda seen it coming?!

Shoulda ripped the dick off, deprive the zionist state of the cum it covets.

In a preindustrial society, your children are your social safety net. Having a bunch of kids insures that there is someone who can be with you as you age. Also, some of those children are likely to die, so if you want to be taken care of, better have an extra child or three. And since you are likely farming the land anyway, it's fine to have another pair of hands to do that around, means more work gets done and so more food and actually more wealth as well, once that kid can help out. And if you are not farming, congrats, you are one of the few people in preindustrial society that are rich and you don't have to worry at all about feeding and housing your children.

In a modern society, there is supposedly social safety nets that make having many children less necessary as a survival tool. Now these are being eroded and living conditions get worse, but people aren't simply going to forget they are supposed to be there. It is known how rich you have to be now to afford children, because every child is a real burden on your wealth, because the kid will not be able to do any useful work and will need costly help in the form of education to be ready to even leave the house in 20+ years. And it is bad parenting to not provide for your child. Most people can do the math if they can afford that cost on a napkin and for many, the answer is no. And yea, of course you could just not provide your child with what it needs, but that's not exactly a recipe for getting the child to help you out later.

So no, getting even poorer is not going to raise the birth rate. Maybe in the long term if capitalism collapses and gives way to feudalism 2, electric boogaloo, where a few trillionaires own everything and everyone else doesn't kill them and instead works for them for some weird reason.

Can't just be a tax credit! We gotta means test the fuck out of that to make sure that child will have a business in a low-income neighbourhood in 30 years.

But they will at least get better service for that money, right?

Right?

You are a true brain genius of the highest order, my friend. Please, tell is all your wisdom of the USSR and provide sources. Thank you so much.

Not only will this be woke (according to idiots), it will also be the most toothless garbage ever.

You know a show is irrelevant when the President of the USA is talking about it. Geniuses.

Like, South Park sucks, but they know how to get in the spotlight.

Steal from corporations, not form people's pantries you sick, disgusting fuck.

For real, do you not understand that the corpos are taking everyone's...EVERYONE'S things and making them theirs, for these garbage bots? That there is a difference between stealing from an individual as opposed to a company? You are gleefully saying that theft of personal property is okay, so long as it's the big boys in silicon valley doing it.

Sterling fucking socialist theory there, bucko!

And since you clearly need this explained more clearly: stealing from individual artists that honed a skill to the point they can make a living from it is bad, because you are stealing the livelihood from a fellow worker. Stealing form any individual is bad, actually. It really should not be hard to understand this, yet somehow...

Sign me up I love pistacios.

These better be salted though! Nothing worse than accidentally buying unslated.

"AI will make so many jobs obsolete! Not yours though, we need you to work two jobs for one pay!"

AI will collapse in on itself within a few years. Not even government contracts can fill the black hole of cost these things incur.

I am on the right side of this picture.

It's always sad when I gotta actually block someone from hexbear, but since you are just a larper who doesn't care about others as soon as you can have the slightest whiff of a treat for yourself, I am not really sad about it.

"Hey man I need to see all your text and all your images you ever made."

""Why?"

"So I can make bad collage-copies of them and write shitty listicles."

"I don't want you to do that."

"Too bad, you put your stuff somewhere I could see it so I already did it and you have no recourse now because the powerful people that made me are above copyright law."

There is no personal use with this, because the AI was trained on everyone's stolen information. That is the problem, not the fact that it can make a bad picture because that was done. If the AIs could actually make anything from whole cloth, then we'd be having a different debate, but that's not what's going on.

So you are seriously saying that AI has the ability to understand concepts? Waow.

Please educate yourself and don't spout bullshit, thanks.

Ask any artist if they are satisfied with their art. They won't be. That is the nature of the beast. Doesn't matter how good they are at it.

I have done art on and off for years as well. I would estimate I did maybe a few thousand hours of art in my life. Other people have done literally 10 to 100 times that and they are better because of it. You hone your skills over time. Anyone like me dabbling in art has to accept that there are countless people who put in more time, who are better and who will stay being better because they will keep putting more time in then us.

Using AI, you steal those hours from those people, for a product that doesn't show what's in your head. It's stilly to pretend AI can do that and you know it. If that were true, all the art prompters wouldn't include the names of existing artists in their prompts.

So yea, put in the fucking time, or get off the field. Don't be fucking selfish and then try to defend it in flimsy ways.