You mean like this?

It's perfectly legal but personally, I would not find this really ethical: a lot of people don't know F-Droid and if they find your application directly in the Play Store, they won't know they can have it, the exact same application, for free but elsewhere.

I prefere one of those solutions:

• The ability to send a donation, it's a very common thing.
• Having the same application twice on the Play Store, one for free and one with a fixed price (I don't remember which app do this but I saw it once).

Of course this is my point of view, everyone has its own vision of what is ethical or not. Do not take my comment as the absolute truth!

This new app is a failure but THIS is the kind of things we need: a publicly readable tasks board about the product we use. I would love to have this for other applications.

[…] avant que quiconque en abuse.

Trop tard on dirait ! 😬

Each Flatpak package has a unique ID in its remote. Librewolf is distributed as a Flatpak package from the well-known Flathub remote. The ID has not been migrated since the migration from Gitlab to Codeberg but it does not mean the package is on Gitlab, it's on Flathub (and has never been on Gitlab itself).

Il me surprend que ce soit moins pratiqué que le football là-bas 🤐

Mainstream enough to have its own architecture vulnerability with a patch that takes a big performance hit. Congrats!

https://www.phoronix.com/news/GhostWrite-Vulnerability-RISC-V

There was the Project Sandcastle it doesn't seem active anymore.