OpenStars @ OpenStars @piefed.social

Compassion >~ Thought

---

Read more

Posts

54

Comments

3,866

Joined

9 mo. ago

It's a fair cop.

Wow that makes the pace of new feature development all the more striking.

Different strokes for different folks

This comment wins Lemmy for today.🤗

M-m-maybe it should be, we don't need to judge! 🤪

You do you:-). But even then there are other things that could have been done instead, e.g. submitting a report to a mod or blocking someone, or leaving a community that is stressing you out. Ofc downvoting is perfectly fine as a choice as well, which will show up in your Attitude score that you are someone that does that, i.e. someone who is "critical" of content that you see on the internet and often interacts with it in that manner. It is up to you and also to the people looking at your profile to determine if you want to consider that "bad" or not, though I sincerely doubt that such a score (of 80) would ever qualify for that term.

But we have no idea what your personal filter rules are...

You keep saying "bad" but perhaps it's more like... "critical"?

That said, if you don't like something, why go to the trouble to rub someone's face in how you do not like it, rather than simply scroll down and move on with your life? Maybe even leave the community, block the OP, etc. - not liking something is not an ideal reason to downvote it, imho.

And the reason for that is that on the receiving end, someone getting a bunch of downvotes without anyone bothering go explain why, isn't a great feeling. It leaves them not knowing what it was that people disliked, and with the feeling that people are judging them but not before bothering to do a proper assessment. i.e. that the community is unfriendly towards them, maybe even full of people with a childish mindset.

I haven't even so much as glanced at your history so none of this is a judgement against you: I am just illustrating why a lot of people prefer to downvote responsibly, and therefore why someone might want to know what your "Attitude" score is, so that they can more properly pay attention or ignore when you interact with them - e.g. if you downvoted everything then someone receiving a downvote would not "mean" so much compared to someone receiving the literally only downvote that someone else has ever delivered.

Believe it or not, but I'm down with anything that you do authentically:-P. It's when people say one thing but then do the opposite that I feel confused. Though since you are honest and forthright about it, you do you and I'm happy that you've found what gives you joy.:-D

That is very interesting point. For me, judgement is "work" and comes at the end, after gathering facts, whereas for some they seem to take shortcuts to rush directly to that part. Proper judgement of matters - as we see in fields such as science, medicine, engineering, mathematics, education (STEM), as well as law, history, especially philosophy (liberal arts) - is difficult and not to be joked around about. So perhaps discussion of such is entirely incompatible with... not quite "the internet" bc that is simply a tool to be used however we please, but rather with "social media" (as you brought up).

Although (even here I cannot allow myself to rush to judgement in order to say that!? 😜) perhaps that is an oversimplification since we all can fall prey to biases in our thinking at some point along our chain of thinking. It is just that some people actually seem to care about that while others not so much; read that as in: not at all. And ofc some think in manners that are diametrically opposed, not as in a 180 reversal but tangential as in truth serves the end of emotional gratification combined with might makes right hence authoritarianism, e.g. "I don't like what I see and since I have that power I will downvote it" - but not bc it deserves to be thus, and instead bc it feels good to do so.

So now I will judge the ml admin team - although with the major caveats that they are 100% free to do as they please, and that I support large portions of their work as well as the process by which they went about it: they absolutely dared to be the change that they wanted to see in the world, and the highly successful Lemmy is the result of that. Also... it is always much easier to criticize rather than create. All that said, two wrongs do not make a right: discarding some of "Reddit" while keeping other parts of it are not to my tastes, and will lead to Lemmy ultimately being unsuccessful in the Western world. Which they are aware of, and actively okay with: they made Lemmy for themselves, not others. I do not entirely respect people who use alternative facts, though I respect them as developers infinitely more than their followers who don't question anything and simply make fun of Western society bc of groupthink, exactly like Hexbear just less extreme, so like in kind if not to the same degree. (And I am entirely ignoring all of leftist philosophy itself since we've discussed it before - everything here is completely ignoring content and focusing solely on process.)

And I think differently about the .world admin team: they have a hard job, but they are doing it? Not halting entirely but pausing discussion of jury nullification for like - what was it? - 3 days while they consult their legal standing seems entirely different to me. Also defederating from Hexbear I actually agree with. Most of what the trolls seem to blame them for I end up siding with the reasonable-seeming (to me?) LW admins rather than the complainers. I might be ignorant here: is there something huge that I am missing where the LW admins are somehow acting like the ML team? I'm legit not seeing it - I know people claim that but I do not know why?

Both end up censoring and removing stuff, but the difference is that LW is transparent from the beginning about precisely what that is - leaving people free to move to another instance if that is what they prefer - whereas the ML is disingenuous in claiming to be purely an instance focusing on FOSS and privacy, leaving people having to find out the hard way the actual facts of the situation. In essence they refuse to have consideration that some other side to the topic even so much as exists, much less deserves to be mentioned or explained what their stance is about - "Russia is (apparently?) awesome" and they will brook no dispute about that, on pain of instance-wide banning, but nowhere do they ever actually SAY that (that I have seen, and I spent hours looking).

As for leftist, I no longer feel comfortable discussing in too much depth my own thoughts (I live in the USA and could literally end up in a concentration camp for even misperceptions about such), but I will say that the most hated groups by authoritarians tend to be the "with me but not as with me as I would hope" camps. Purity testing will continue until morale improves, smdh 😞.

I want to say moon bc burn... but the sun is shining at me rn and that's pretty cool too. Maybe they both have something to offer so imma go with "por que no los dos?"

I... may not have properly thought that one through, but I'll stick with it regardless, bc logic can't tell me what to do!?!

Ah that explains the mystery of why the glasses were wet (with anticipation) then!

It's okay not to be perfect, perhaps:-D

I would really start with the pooping, as in NOW!!! Especially with an upset tummy.

Brush your teeth in the kitchen sink if you have to.

Set a timer to feed the fish - maybe have it not make any noise like just vibrate, and don't stop it until the fish is fed. If the timer is gone then the fish are fed. I can't handle pets rn though so what do I know... :-P I just really enjoy my patterns rn and want to share that:-D.

Fuck those glasses (not literally, that would make it way worse).

Probably nowhere near as bad as that hippy freak, what was his name... "Jesus"?

It would seem so, yes.

Evidence: xkcd is never wrong. :-P

(Although I have always wondered about that aspect yes... perhaps an attack has to switch between trying random letters and random words, which may limit its effectiveness, and still keep the number of words high? What if we swapped out letters like c0rr3ct? - b/c obviously hackers have never heard of 1337 5p33ch before. Yeah I really have not looked this one up, hence default to the joke answer above. irl I use the FOSS KeePass and a large string of random crap... but that is nowhere near as funny to say as correct horse battery staple:-D

Also, https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936:_Password_Strength does talk about this - but unless it is in the references, there is not too much depth there, e.g. a dictionary may have a certain number of words, but I doubt that they are all used equally - some werds oft encroaches upon my visage with verily greater frequency of occurrence by comparison to alterity, so while in the sense of spherical chickens sliding on a frictionless surface a dictionary attack "may not be viable", in practice I highly suspect that a way could be found to find, if not one specific password, then at least somebody's password within a large bank of them.)

To touch grass - literally! (assuming weather permits, and if not then we'll do it later, so it's all good:-)

I have virtually given up on having "logical" conversations on Lemmy. Admiral Patrick and you represent roughly half of the list of people that I still trust that I can do that with. The amount of "witch hunting" and "purity testing" - as the meme goes - is too damn high!!!

I can agree with someone 99% of the way, but if I forget myself and say just ONE thing different - like I prefer Unix but not Linux, or maybe Linux but not Arch? - then it's all APOSTASY!!!

I cannot remember the last time that I downvoted someone. But people were even downvoting Admiral Patrick (the dev of Tesseract) for posting his goodbye message - get this - in his own community, housed on his own instance. I commented there in an Edit, how on earth is that kind of message "less relevant" (the purpose behind a downvote) in such a community?

When I look around, I mostly see just kids vomiting up their emotions. Which... I shitpost too damnit! But I also like to close the door and have a place to have a more sedate discussion with people who are interested and have actually thought for one second about a topic prior to speaking. It is not that I am against the PRESENCE of the former, but rather than I am adamant that the ABSENCE of even so much as the capability to allow for the latter that is killing Lemmy, day by day.

But that's less of a "Reddit" problem imho and more of a "Lemmy was made by authoritarian devs who prefer to admin their own instance the the desires of the rest of the world to use the software differently than that are kinda their own problem, not that of the devs?" Which makes perfect sense. And encourages me leave Lemmy.

Which I did - PieFed is fantastic:-). Although a lot of the "content" is still on Lemmy, and thus subject to Lemmy moderation rules, which involve a ton of human volunteer curation effort, even as the mod gets spit upon for not being pure enough.

I too think that karma can be useful if done sparingly - e.g. if someone has "enough" karma to post in certain, more thoughtful communities, but beyond that threshold count it means nothing. Much like there are rooms for toddlers to play in, rooms for adolescents, and ostensibly rooms for "adults" as well... although when kids are allowed to enter and scream as loud as they can to their hearts content, doesn't it REALLY become a room for kids, or at least mixed ages? The threshold limiter is the only thing I can think of that would allow for it to be quiet. Either that or kick the loudest, screamiest (hehe that's not a word as we both know:-P) kid out after they've already screamed... except we do not do that, and this place allowing for total anonymity means that they simply slip right back in nearly instantly after being kicked out. Which is why Admiral Patrick said that he left: as lemm.ee shut down, all the trolls went elsewhere and somehow forgot to helpfully label themselves with the same account name as they had on lemm.ee, forcing him to have to start all over again... or just leave the Threadiverse entirely:-(.

Yes, Lemmy is Reddit 2.0, somehow even more authoritarian than even Reddit was. Like we've replaced spez with dessalines: instead of one person saying what we can and cannot criticize we have someone else disallowing any criticism of Russia, China, or North Korea... tbf we also have our choice of other admins as well, or if we are willing to pay the electricity, network traffic, time, skill, and attention costs (especially for being mindful of CSAM attacks), ourselves, but the latter seem to be very few, especially as the Threadiverse grows in size and scope and traffic.

PieFed solves much of that, but it is still new and so trades one set of problems with a different set.

Why aren't people trying to do something about it? Because there is only so much that mods and even admins CAN do, while still on the Lemmy software. People kept waiting for a better replacement: Kbin.social provided a strong hope but then it died, and Mbin another but it seems to have stalled and is not everyone's cup of tea, then there was Sublinks that seemed to offer promise but it too stalled as the dev had a baby - see e.g. this post where the admins of Lemmy.World expressed strong hope in it. And now finally we have PieFed, which finally FULFILLS all of those hopes and dreams!! Maybe. At least it exists, and it has tons of features, and so now also piefed.world has been created as well, as a test. So... perhaps this will open up what you are talking about?

It will take effort though: mods will have to learn how to set up and use the automated tools. I imagine therefore that a few mods will end up automating the moderation of many many communities at once, even more so than on Lemmy. But once it is automated... it can scale as large as desired?

But "Lemmy" itself does not care about growing, as you have already seen. Pop over to lemmy.ml and look at some of the conversations happening on Local: they want to remain their echo chamber, disconnected from centrists from the Western world? (edit: there are oh so many spelling mistakes in this comment, but I am going to ignore all of those and yet still want to clarify this one point: I know you are a leftist, and at one point I thought I was too, but compared to the likes of hexbear and lemmygrad.ml and even lemmy.ml we are flaming right-wingers, I believe? if you [checks notes] "have a bank account", then you aren't leftist enough for them). Which is fine - we'll go make our own spaces, as we have already started and are in the process of doing just this past month, especially as lemm.ee went down and many MANY communities migrated not to another Lemmy server but to a PieFed one, plus several new ones were created. Speaking of brace yourself, but a good third or more of Lemmy traffic might also shift over to PieFed, especially if Lemmy.World decides to shut down, like if the admins prefer to keep their focus on only one piece of software, and the mods give up having to deal with all the toxicity without having access to the automated tools (as Admiral Patrick finally did). But more likely it will be a graduated shift, punctuated by fits and starts in response to various stimuli.

The answer remains the same as always: if you build it they will come (and conversely you HAVE to build it or else they will not), but the interpretation of that hits differently after this past month of migrations to PieFed, because the pace of that building process seems to have quickened! (or in reality it merely has entered a phase where the growth is more visible to us using common metrics, such as Monthly Active Users, rather than more intangible ones such as GitHub commits of a variety of software features)