Our country has almost no history of resistance aside from Abdelkrim Khattabi. And even the one hero that we have, Moroccans will betray him because their monarch is like a God to them.
Why is Lincoln shown? What does the author try to imply?
Because the USA is still heavily involved in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. The same USA that destroyed Iraq is now pursuing its interests in another region of the world.
The difference here is that the USA supports Ukraine, whereas Iraq was alone in its fight.
There was a revolt in the Rif when berber tribes decided to cut ties with the royal family and declare independence. Later there was a period of instability called the years of lead where forces were acting to try to overthrow the Moroccan monarchy.
Because Algeria and Libya had revolutions. There were a few attempts in Morocco but they were all defeated by the government of the ruling family which had become friends with the west since the start of the 20th century.
The population is majority muslim, but the government has no problem being Zionist.
It's not the middle ages anymore. If it means they can share part of the superprofits, the Moroccan government will abandon any principles it had. This is true for other countries such as Saudi Arabia or even other terrorist groups.
A zionist government that collaborated with french occupiers. The biggest obstacle to stability in North Africa and a traitor to the Palestinian cause.
Because at that point Germany had signed the treaty with the Soviet Union
