I've been a programmer for decades and I still sometimes look at code I wrote 6 months ago like what the fuck was I thinking. Code is as much art as science.
These two having any kind of conversation would be fucking hilarious. Absolute opposite ends of the spectrum of narcisstic assholes, they would both go insane trying to out alpha each other while being completely unable to communicate in any way that made sense to each other.
In Osaka last year on holiday with some mates, out at a bar and we're all pretty loaded and somehow ended up talking about the Fallout games (because we're all huge nerds), I assume pretty loudly. An American woman comes up to us and tells us that she heard us talking about Fallout and that she is a producer on the TV show for it and how cool it is to hear some randos talking about how much they like the games and that she's really excited about the show and how good its going to be.
Made our night, we're all kicking ourselves for not getting some kind of contact details off her because it would be great to message her and let her know how much we like the show.
I knew a lot of people who did not recognise that Starship Troopers was parody.
Super underrated, the final fight is a letdown but the rest of the film is on par with the first.
Such a niche reference, but so good. If you know it you can't not hear the voice.
Yeah the narrative is that Spurs need to rush to put a winning team around Wemby but I think that's an overreaction, and SAS is the organisation that you know is going to stick to the plan. It's frustrating that this draft is so weak, but if there's any hidden gold in there SAS have a great record of finding it.
Linux, bro.
Linux.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses can't define how I be dropping these mockeries"
Are you a legal expert? Is the fact that this is "art" not a more complex legal issue?
edit: Quote from the article: "Mona’s legal team will be relying on the tribunal’s interpretation of section 26 of Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Act, under which a person is permitted to discriminate against another person in a situation designed to promote equal opportunity for a group of people who are disadvantaged or have a special need because of a prescribed attribute – in this case gender. It is under clauses like this in most of Australia’s anti-discrimination legislation that organisations such as male-only clubs and women-only gyms are able to operate."
The difference between a racial slur and an acceptably shortened country name is a matter of history. "Aussie" should never be seen as a slur because it has never been a commonly used racial insult. Context is important.
