Skip Navigation
Deleted
rule
  • Great response!

    If he replies with something like « I need you to come in » you should follow up with « I’m sure you do, good luck dude. »

    Never break it, that’s hilarious.

  • Removed
    Afghan schoolgirls are finishing sixth grade in tears. Under Taliban rule, their education is over
  • Whatabout you make a single argument supporting your position? Because if all you can think is « kill bad guys then everyone happy », you might want to educate yourself with something other than Disney movies.

  • Removed
    Afghan schoolgirls are finishing sixth grade in tears. Under Taliban rule, their education is over
  • So if Russia wants to bomb your leaders because your country allows slaves in prison like a middle age shithole, you wouldn’t mind do you? You should actually welcome it.

    And then when your leaders keep ruling as tyrants by refusing to give universal healthcare to your people, the EU should execute your leaders immediately, you agree?

    And when your police keep murdering black people, your leaders should once again get blasted, you’ll get the message eventually, right?

    You wouldn’t disagree with these rightful bombings, would you? It’s all for putting you out of your oppression and the dark ages.

  • How do companies know if I use cracked software or assets for my personal gig?
  • For assets, you would be distributing other people’s work without permission. Some companies scan online content for digital fingerprints of copyrighted material. Think Youtube content ID but they are other tools out there.

    As for software you used without a license, the work you did doesn’t matter in that regard, you’re only liable for using unlicensed software by bypassing copyright protection methods. You’re not distributing it. Their DRM (even cracked) might send them enough identifiable information to sue you (in theory).

  • You google it if you like. You won't find it.
  • You seem to have a very narrow view about meaning. You seem to only accept a definition of meaning which portrays one objective truth.

    Science doesn’t even claim that such universal meaning exists in the first place. It recognizes that meaning is a subjective feeling. A sense of meaning as you would say and what this comment thread was originally about.

    Besides, it’s very debatable that religion provides such explanation about our existence either. It all comes down to « because god » which isn’t meaning in itself, just a injunction to have faith. Religion hasn’t « found » any more meaning than science. Meaning in religion is provided through faith.

    Therapy (science) has helped many people directly find a sense of meaning in their lives on a large scale. But science has helped people find meaning in so many different ways. Science practicians such as doctors, engineers, teachers and so many other people find meaning because of it on a massive scale. People who don’t practice science also find meaning thanks to it because it enables them to live their passion, be creative, do good in the world, help others, etc. which are all actual meaning for people.

    People find meaning. It is not « found by » science or religion. Your semantics on that actually doesn’t make sense. People find meaning in something that provides what they resonate with. They can find meaning in religion, family, career, etc. and often it is not just one thing. Religion can’t find meaning but can help provide some.

    Your whole conception of meaning is flawed.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
    Sheik @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 30