I'm practically drowning in pussy.
1- Key in the tree, entrance
2- Door opposite the entrance in the lobby, leads to the room below the Bow
3- Bottom of the well, switch to drain the well is on one of the outdoor balconies reachable from the other outdoor room
4- Twist the first twistable hallway (if it isn't already), fall down the hole. Follow to a dead end room
Lol, blue maga. That terminology ain't sticking. Try again.
I got one for you. Who gives a shit?
I want to live in a country where people are afraid to break the law. I know that sounds crazy...
So you want fascism.
Ask the wrestlers Gym coached.
Because you've been fucking duped by republicans ya dunce.
...you do realize that Ukraine is only getting a surplus of US equipment that was going to be replaced? Totaling the amount of those Ukraine defense bills? There is no money being exchanged, lol.
Gee, I didn't know not being American means you're automatically Russian. Either way, you're intentionally missing the entire point of my replies. You don't know how your own government works. Helping Ukraine in no way is draining tax payer money, ya dunce.
Never said there wasn't.
I'm just pointing out that you don't even know how your own government works, that is, if you're even American.
At this point, you're asking for a communist. Good luck trying to get that going in the states.
And this right here is an example of someone not knowing how their own government works.
"Everyone i disagree with is a centrist. If I spilled my bowl of cereal, it was a centrist. If I stub my toe, it was a centrist. If I get called out for being a giant crybaby who victimizes themselves in every argument, its a centrist."
Seems to me that there's a massive global conspiracy that everyone in your life and on this planet is a centrist and are specifically only fucking with you, and only you Ensign_crab.
This is what you're guilty of invincible ignorance fallacy, or better yet, the argument by pigheadedness.
the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used in this fallacy is either to make assertions with no consideration of objections or to simply dismiss objections by calling them excuses, conjecture, anecdotal, etc. or saying that they are proof of nothing, all without actually demonstrating how the objections fit these terms. It is similar to the ad lapidem fallacy, in which the person rejects all the evidence and logic presented, without providing any evidence or logic that could lead to a different conclusion.