I'll save anyone else the hassle of clicking the link. It's a True North article. Lawl

• eta wrong comment sorry.

Thanks for running this instance! I didn't realize I joined less than a month after lemm.ee's inception! Mad gratitude to all of you putting in the work to keep it going for all of us.

Was coming here to say this. GL-Inet routers are awesome for the price. I have a Slate. Friggin love it.

This kinda describes where Linux has been at with sleep/hibernation for quite a few years. I don't understand the deeper implications but it's never seemed like a priority for Linux devs, vs how Windows and Mac have solved it long ago. Maybe because Linux hasn't traditionally focused on portable devices but arm (etc) seems to be changing that.

Boom.

!thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

I can answer this. The stuff that nobody takes off the shelf eventually gets thrown out too. But if you put brown rice and rice pasta in a hamper for someone that won't eat them, and white bread and white pasta in someone's hamper that won't eat them, 100% of those staples go to waste.

This is anecdotal so take it or leave it but some of the best dumpster diving I've ever done was behind food banks in some regions because things like quinoa and apple cider vinegar and brown rice pasta are the last to go while white bread and Kraft dinner and instant rice are hot sellers.

I'm happy to stock up on the stuff other people find too weird to eat. If those things end up in hampers they get chucked anyhow. Letting people choose is a far more efficient system.

Lots of banks for instance will give you more veggie options if you don't eat meat. Or more eggs if you don't want meat. Or more frozen foods if you don't want canned or instant meals. Etc etc.

The hamper system tries to shoot the middle. Nobody "eats what they get" if they literally can't stomach the stuff "they get" and frankly expecting poor people to choke down calories that someone else picks out for them and expecting them to be grateful for it is kinda a sick way to look at it. Beggars can't be choosers and all this... In a culture that throws away roughly fifty percent of the food grown and processed on this continent in the name of profit? Idk. Why not let people take what they'll use and leave the rest?

If you actually understand how much food goes into the landfill vs what gets diverted to food banks the entire concept of food scarcity falls apart anyhow.

This is good intel actually. I used HoloISO for a long time on my gaming rig but I never thought to mess around with those settings because I've always just thought of Linux battery use as ass (have run various distros on tons of different laptops as well). Would be good to take the deck deeper hibernation settings for a spin, but it would be kinda a shame if the deck devs haven't already explored these things in ways I'll never understand as a lay user, frankly. You'd think they'd be tweaking this stuff mercilessly for the UX and battery life.

Poor all my life prior till about three years ago. Like highschool dropout street addict poor. And still made it out to protests and food-not-bombs cookouts and other actions across the country. By the mid nineties when I was a late teen I could see what the Walmart and Starbucks were doing to my culture and I tried to do something about it.

Yeah. If spending my last dollar on ramen from the local corner store instead of 50 cents at the big box has ever been an option, I've taken it. Happily. I understand the economics of raising a family in suburbia is different than what I've experienced as a person but I also understand that if everyone swallows the capitalism pill without coughing on it we're all fuckin doomed. And you don't need to be a punk or a radical to have access to that information in this era. At all.

Sorry but this model of foodbank was roughly over 70% the norm in most places prior to covid because it cuts down on wasted food (i.e. the hamper box system distributes a lot of food people either don't, or won't eat). Post-covid most banks had to go back to the hamper model to limit exposure to the sorting and storage areas.

I've both volunteered and worked at, as well as drawn from, several food banks. Idk if sask is just decades behind or what's going on with this article but, no.

Nobody had to shop at the place offering "the cheapest shit" while all the smaller businesses were forced out of the market. People literally had a choice to spend one extra dollar, or end up here.

If you fall for the rhetoric that money is everything then yeah alright... Nobody could do anything about it I guess.

Thanks for that. I've been thinking of it as a sleep/hibernate function but obviously it's not. Linux still hasn't seemed to figure that one out for some reason. Not Steam's fault.

Thank you. Was wondering if mine was normal in this way after having it for over six months.

Bluetooth is disabled, as is the Wi-Fi antenna. Which I always do with any devices I turn things off that I don't need.

Between this community and the actual Onion I get pretty much the gist of current events, yeah. If some topic or other piques my interest from here, I'll chase it down. The Onion and its opposite tend to give me enough of the context I need to figure out what's important enough to pursue vs the vast majority of quasi-satire hitting "normal" news cycles over a given week.

It's like a hyper-curated way to get my news, as if handpicked for me by a space clown. And I like it that way.

Thanks yeah I figured. I'm not being very scientific about it yet but for instance none of my laptops discharge that much if I shut the lid and walk away for a couple days, but then again they're bigger cells.

1. Walmart as a better alternative to buy anything is just fucking sad
2. Any business that was around during Walmarts rise learned from it and perfected competition-crushing aspects that it missed
3. People have been screaming that this business model will destroy quality of life for everyone given a long enough timeline, and it is now here

Lots of people saw this coming and the vast majority of people didn't want to acknowledge it. I don't know what else to say.

I understand that. However logging is taking out fir forests and replanting with pine and spruce. I hazard a guess that if the biomass were left alone less issues would occur given those primary forests have thrived for a very long time on their own.

In my early twenties I was looking for a field of work that was semi environmentally friendly. I had grown up in southern Alberta where it's all factory farming, mono culture crops, and O&G. For a minute (as a prairie kid) I thought tree planting might be a good way. Basic research even back then showed me that young women who expect to get pregnant within the next fifteen years should not be handling seedlings because the fungicides and pesticides dusted on the root balls are so toxic. Then there's the GMO monoculture of the species of trees they're replanting with.

End of the day I didn't feel like contributing to the next wave of suburb and luxury condo developments. Rednecks always like to say "they grow back" when we talk about protecting old growth forests and it's obvious that trees (individually) can be grown on a given plot of land (like wheat in a season on the plains)... But the conversation ends when we talk about how it takes millennia to grow the type of environmental diversity primal forests have established.

Oh no! Pine Beatles and drought and other things are affecting our crop of trees! Who could've predicted such a thing!?? Bailout please.