TerranFenrir @ TerranFenrir @lemmy.ca Posts 12Comments 19Joined 2 wk. ago
You got me for 0.4201 seconds
- If the civilization that discovers it is more advanced than 20th century humanity, then no. They would know their purpose.
- If it's not as technologically advanced, the it's possible I suppose
Same test for comment:
Naked link: https://youtube.com/
https://youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2G5IR9gAqI
Nah they'll say "your the dumb fuck"
Carney unveils signature housing plan he says will double pace of home building in Canada
Are you really Obamna?
Nono no need to LIVE on the moon. Living in microgravity is bad for health. Living in rotating space habitats is the only realistic way we get space cities.
But yes, the moon definitely has the advantage of no atmosphere. Basically, the moon is where we place our industries (for the orbital and interplanetary economies).
NOOOOOO not fairrrrr
Mars is so incredibly useless from the point of view of advancing civilization.
We can do so much stuff on the moon a lot better than on Mars. In short, the moon is MEANT to be industrialised by us.
Here's a video, cuz I'm too lazy to type out everything. Also, sorry for the YouTube link. I don't think this fellow uploads anywhere else.
Also don't get me wrong. Mars is really cool as a scientific curiosity. It's just not suitable for advancing civilization yet.
This is art, isn't it? I'm feeling so many emotions for this "old gaming rig" or whatever. Poor fella... :(. Hope they (the rig) survive a lot longer...
Pathetic reply
Pathetic comment
More nesting
Invalidate queries
