This is nothing... imagine that to this day we have people who believe the Russia-gate nonsense, despite the FBI having poured 25 million USD into it and found nothing, and people in CNN admitting it was a hoax. But mission accomplished... people are duped.
I'm not American, but this whole "indictment" nonsense is just attempts to cheat in 2024 to prevent Trump from rallying. They're terrified! They know if Trump wins he'll empty the swamp and remove 90% of the bureaucrats. He swore he'll do it.
And people still doubt this is a civil war... and dumber people to this day think this is done in good faith. The stupidity of humans never stops to impress me. Go ahead, Americans, start killing each other already... maybe then you'll learn how to respect each other's boundaries, like Trump never locked Hillary up because he knows what message it sends.
Yeah, I know. Having basic knowledge on how the economy works makes me a smartass. But the good news here is that I know the majority here are dumbass who don't know anything other than bullshit propaganda that's used to keep them poor forever. You can either read a book or enjoy the bottom while crying about it. Crying is easier though.
Nice come back. I bet the herd loves such comebacks when you can't argue with logic.
If you're dumb enough to compare something that isn't tangible or measurable in any way with an economic system that's been running for thousands of years, then feel free. Ignorance is loved nowadays. It's the norm. Enjoy the herd's approval!
Or maybe avoid wasteful government spending?
"I hate capitalism" is code for "I have no idea how anything in the economy works"
Wanna bet? Ask one of those "I hate capitalism" dudes, what's the difference between fiscal and monetary policy, and don't hold your breath because you'll laugh.
Even better. Ask them the difference between free market capitalism and crony capitalism and how that relates to the current economies and central banking.
Well, I guess teenagers remain teenagers for decades some times.
Thank you, but my question was specifically about DNS. Another person pointed out that setting the DNS record to the VPN destination is the right answer. I appreciate the details you wrote and I'll look into them.
Thank you for the clarification. I'll give that a shot. Cheers!
Please see this comment to understand my frustrations with the answers in this thread (copy/pasted from another comment):
Iâve been managing servers for over 10 years, and I never have felt stupider, and I still donât understand how to do this. Everyone is making a comment that I donât understand.
Letâs talk internet 101, and please tell me where Iâm wrong.
You make a request to https://myservice.example.com. The DNS responds to a query giving you an IP address, say 1.2.3.4. Now the client software makes another request to 1.2.3.4:433 (say if weâre attempting to access an https server, binding the SNI address to the SSL/TLS header). The request will be sent to that server, and the server will respond. In what part of all this process can the VPN can do anything?
Normally if you want to access a device through VPN, you make a request to a WHOLE other ip address in another subnet on another (virtual) device locally. It has absolutely nothing to do with 1.2.3.4. Itâs something like 10.10.100.X⊠or similar. How will my domain, myservice.example.com, route to that address, 10.10.100.X? Is it as dumb and simple as routing there? Or is there more to it? It doesnât sound right to make the DNS server record point to 10.10.100.X.
I've been managing servers for over 10 years, and I never have felt stupider, and I still don't understand how to do this. Everyone is making a comment that I don't understand.
Let's talk internet 101, and please tell me where I'm wrong.
You make a request to https://myservice.example.com. The DNS responds to a query giving you an IP address, say 1.2.3.4. Now the client software makes another request to 1.2.3.4:433 (say if we're attempting to access an https server, binding the SNI address to the SSL/TLS header). The request will be sent to that server, and the server will respond. In what part of all this process can the VPN can do anything?
Normally if you want to access a device through VPN, you make a request to a WHOLE other ip address in another subnet on another (virtual) device locally. It has absolutely nothing to do with 1.2.3.4. It's something like 10.10.100.X... or similar. How will my domain, myservice.example.com, route to that address, 10.10.100.X? Is it as dumb and simple as routing there? Or is there more to it? It doesn't sound right to make the DNS server record point to 10.10.100.X.
Please elaborate a little more. So assuming the server where the service lies has IP address 1.2.3.4, and some VPN that I can connect to with 1.2.3.4:1194. If my DNS server points to 1.2.3.4, and say there's an http server there that's normally accessible with 1.2.3.4:80, how will we enforce that working only through VPN?
But what about the domain name association? How is that done?
Say I have a public server with a service (email, web server, etc) that's accessible through https://myservice.example.com, and I would like to restrict that service with a VPN. How do I do that?
I know how to setup a VPN. I know how to use some of the services through that VPN. But see, if I want to use that VPN, I connect my client to that VPN, then I get the subnet of that VPN, say 10.10.100.0, through which I can access the devices by address.
But I see some services offer things like https://myservice.example.com, and they only work when that VPN is connected. How does that work? Is it just some DNS setting at the domain level or there's more to it?
Security analysis doesn't require the source code. TikTok was repeatedly analyzed without it being open source.
The amount of shilling Sync receives makes me worry that something is up with it. It's not normal that I even believe some bots and sock puppets are involved. I'm not touching it with a long stick until someone does some proper security analysis on it. I'm not dumb to fall for peer pressure. Good luck, guys!
As long as average Joe doesn't care about their rights, no one will change.
Taxes going up, quality of life going down.
Good job. Let's keep doing that and attack everyone that suggests that giving the government more money isn't the answer.
"Communists": let's give the government even more money and more power and wish for the best.
Sounds like a plan! đ
All this is normal. It'll make Lemmy stronger over time.